Combining inventories for ethical action
Lessons from using ‘community ethnobotany’ for food forest design
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24228342 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anna M Roodhof (0000-0002-0543-0953), Melanie Ziegler, Lucie Sovová (0000-0003-2906-2144) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Agriculture and Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0889-048X • E-ISSN: 1572-8366 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10460-026-10980-9 |
| OpenAlex | W7215132450 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
Food forests present one of the many initiatives which seek to address the unsustainability of the industrial food system, but are often critiqued for paying insufficient attention to socio-economic inequalities. Aware of this risk, the authors and the team of regenerative citizen farm the Biesterhof , located in the Netherlands, engaged in participatory action research (PAR) in effort to include the neighboring community in the design of its future food forest. This paper presents the insights from this process, which built conceptually on ethnobotanical and community economies scholarships towards what we call ‘community ethnobotany’. Participant observation and interviews with the farmers, as well as members of the neighboring communities from various demographic backgrounds revealed different ways of relating to nature and particular plant species. A co-designing workshop kickstarted participants’ emotional investment in the food forest and created a sense of co-ownership between community members and the farmers. The process has provided the farmers with concrete ideas for the food forest design which includes a diverse pool of possible plant and tree species. At the same time, it elucidated physical and financial barriers experienced by some community members that hamper their access to the food forest. This article concludes with a reflection on the conceptual and practical utility of community ethnobotany as a PAR methodology.
Co-design · co-ownership · community economy · Participatory action research · regenerative agriculture · socioeconomic disparities · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability · Urban and spatial planning
Ethnobotany
“If They Only Knew”
Local knowledge and relational values of Midwestern woody perennial polyculture farmers can inform tree‐crop policies
Introduction to The Handbook of Diverse Economies
Wild plants, pregnancy, and the food-medicine continuum in the southern regions of Ghana and Benin
Fight and build
Car-centered Diets, Social Stratification and Cultural Mobility
Community Economy
Critical Gibson-Graham
Just-in-case transitions and the pursuit of resilient food systems
Work in progress
Will work for food
Synergies in alternative food network research
A framework for recognizing diversity beyond capitalism in agri-food systems
Ethnobiology and Degrowth
Historical ecology of forest garden management in L a xyuubm Ts’msyen and beyond
More-than-Human
The Skarù·ręʔ (Tuscarora) Food Forest Project—Reconciliation in Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education through Cross-Cultural Agroforestry Demonstration
Whiteness, space and alternative food practice
Diverse economies
An Economic Ethics for the Anthropocene
Political Ethnobiology
Positioning Food Cultures
The Practice of Food Justice
| Highly cited | No |
|---|