Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bridging knowledge through Buddhist temples

Knowledge co-production in adaptive co-management of agricultural landscapes in Thailand

Bibliographic Data

ID24228357
AuthorsP Sae-heng (0009-0006-9816-2623), Q Li (0000-0002-9724-5439), S Sereenonchai (0000-0001-5185-9382), A Knierim
Year2026
Volume43
Issue2
Publication date2026-04-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAgriculture and Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0889-048X • E-ISSN: 1572-8366
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10460-026-10888-4
OpenAlexW7154278789
LanguageEN
References cited71

Farmers in Thailand face increasing challenges from water-related disasters, prompting the implementation of the Khok Nong Na (KNN) model under the Sufficiency Economy Philosophy (SEP) to promote integrated water and land management in the agricultural landscape. This study employs the adaptive co-management approach to examine the connections between diverse stakeholders and knowledge types in Thai Buddhist agricultural landscape management. Scholars emphasised the integration of science and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), as well as the roles of bridging organisations in knowledge co-production, which is a crucial factor in enhancing adaptive capacity. However, the literature still offers a limited understanding of the roles of faith-based institutions in natural resource management. This study, therefore, aims to investigate the roles of Buddhist temples as bridging organisations in the management of the Buddhist agricultural landscape and how their faith-based networks contribute to knowledge co-production. Using two good-practice case studies, i.e. agriculture–forest landscape management in Chiang Rai and rain-fed rice landscape management in Ubon Ratchathani, we examine the role of Buddhist temples through two brokerage mechanisms: bridging organisations and networks. The findings reveal that Buddhist temples play a moderating role in fostering trust among government officers, local communities, and other stakeholders. Faith-based networks and other contributing factors, including shared religious values, religious educational methods, and knowledge-brokerage roles, enhance social learning and collaboration, thereby contributing to both individual and collective adaptive capacity. Additionally, this study provides empirical evidence on the potential influence of faith-based institutions in shaping the dynamics and equality amongst diverse knowledge systems in knowledge co-production.

Adaptive capacity · adaptive co-management · agricultural landscapes · Buddhist temples · faith-based institutions · knowledge co-production · rainfed rice · religious networks · Social learning · stakeholder trust · sufficiency economy · Thailand · traditional ecological knowledge · water-related disasters · Archaeology and Natural History · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

  • Siku: Knowing Our Ice

    Open Access•Igor Krupnik, Claudio Aporta et al.•SIKU•2010

  • Adaptive Capacity and Community-Based Natural Resource Management

    Open Access•Derek Armitage•Environmental Management•2005

  • Adaptive co‐management for social–ecological complexity

    Open Access•Derek R Armitage, Derek Armitage et al.•Frontiers in Ecology and the…•2009

  • Co-management

    Open Access•Lars Carlsson, F Berkes•Journal of Environmental Management•2005

  • Landscape sustainability science

    Open Access•Jianguo Wu•Landscape Ecology•2013

  • Evolution of co-management

    Open Access•F Berkes•Journal of Environmental Management•2009

  • Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems

    Open Access•Carl Folke, Thomas Hahn et al.•Annual Review of Environment and…•2005

  • Bridging knowledge systems to enhance governance of environmental commons

    Open Access•Kaitlyn Rathwell, Kaitlyn Joanne Rathwell et al.•International Journal of the…•2015

  • Adaptive Co-management in the Context of Informal Settlements

    Open Access•Anne Fitchett•Urban Forum•2014

  • Constructing Cooperation

    Sara Singleton•Constructing cooperation•1999

  • Networks and Religion

    Sean F Everton, Sean Everton•Networks and Religion•2018

  • Knowledge Co-production in Contested Spaces

    Open Access•Nathan P Kettle•ARCTIC•2019

  • Adaptive Comanagement

    Open Access•Ryan Plummer, Beatrice Crona et al.•Conservation Ecology•2012

  • Network Structure, Diversity, and Proactive Resilience Building

    Open Access•Lenore Newman, Jaime Clifton-Ro et al.•Conservation Ecology•2005

  • The Good Buddha and the Fierce Spirits

    Susan M Darlington•Contemporary Buddhism•2007

  • Co‐management and self‐determination in Nunavut

    Thierry Rodon•Polar Geography•1998

  • Who are boundary spanners and how can we support them in making knowledge more actionable in sustainability fields

    Open Access•Kristen A Goodrich, Kathryn Dana Sjostrom et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2020

  • Agri-environmental collaboratives for landscape management in Europe

    Open Access•Katrin Prager•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2014

  • Exploring the Impact of Religious Beliefs, Leadership, and Networks on Response and Recovery of Disaster-affected Populations

    Erin P Joakim, Robert S White•Journal of Contemporary Religion•2015

  • Co-management and the co-production of knowledge

    Open Access•Derek Armitage, F Berkes et al.•Global Environmental Change•2011

  • Governing epidemics in an age of complexity

    Open Access•Macedward Leach, Melissa Leach et al.•Global Environmental Change•2010

  • The role of social networks in natural resource governance

    Open Access•Örjan Bodin, Beatrice Crona et al.•Global Environmental Change•2009

  • Studying Religion in Motion

    Mario A Vásquez, Manuel Vásquez•Method & Theory in the Study of…•2008

  • Environmental values and forest patch conservation in a rural Costa Rican community

    Open Access•Terrence Jantzi, John Schelhas et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•1999

  • Analysis of Stability of Rainfed Rice Cultivation in Northeast Thailand

    Open Access•Kenji Suzuki, Akira Goto et al.•Tōnan Ajia Kenkyū/Tonan ajia kenkyu•1999

  • Social Capital and the Environment

    Open Access•Jules Pretty, Hugh Ward•World Development•2001

  • Activist forest monks, adult learning and the Buddhist environmental movement in Thailand 1

    Pierre Walter•International Journal of Lifelong…•2007

  • Internal Migration in Thailand

    Open Access•Philip Guest, A Chamratrithirong et al.•Asian and Pacific migration journal•1994

  • Reframing science and other local knowledge traditions

    Open Access•David Turnbull•Futures•1997

  • Ecological complexity, fuzzy logic, and holism in indigenous knowledge

    Open Access•F Berkes, Mina Kislalioglu Berkes•Futures•2009

  • Wandering Dhamma and transnational fellowship

    Open Access•Sophorntavy Vorng•Journal of Southeast Asian Studies•2017

  • Eco-Buddhism and Alter-Politics in the Thai Uplands

    Open Access•Amalia Rossi•TRaNS Trans -Regional and…•2025

  • Thailand's Khmer as ‘invisible minority

    Peter Vail•Asian Ethnicity•2007

  • Social capital, civil society and development

    Francis Fukuyama•Third World Quarterly•2001

  • Enhancing the Fit through Adaptive Co-management

    Open Access•Per Olsson, Carl Folke et al.•Conservation Ecology•2007

  • From Community-Based Resource Management to Complex Systems

    Open Access•F Berkes•Conservation Ecology•2006

  • Combining Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge

    Open Access•Henrik Møller, F Berkes et al.•Conservation Ecology•2004

  • A Framework for Clarifying "Participation" in Participatory Research to Prevent its Rejection for the Wrong Reasons

    Open Access•Olivier Barreteau, Pieter W G Bots et al.•Conservation Ecology•2010

  • Boundary spanners

    Open Access•Marco Hatch, Julia K Parrish et al.•Conservation Ecology•2023

  • Learning in Support of Governance

    Open Access•Beatrice Crona, Beatrice I Crona et al.•Conservation Ecology•2012

  • Bridging the Science-Management Divide

    Open Access•Dirk J Roux, Kevin H Rogers et al.•Conservation Ecology•2006

  • The Monk, the Hmong, the Forest, the Cabbage, Fire and Water

    Open Access•Ronald D Renard•Law & Society Review•1994

  • Buddhism and National Integration in Thailand

    Open Access•Charles F Keyes•The Journal of Asian Studies•1971

  • Buddhist Integration of Forest and Farm in Northern Thailand

    Open Access•Susan M Darlington•Religions•2019

  • Mien Relations

    Hjörleifur Jonsson•Mien Relations•2005

  • The Strength of Weak Ties

    Mark Granovetter•Sociological Theory•1983

  • Pangnirtung Inuit and the Greenland Shark

    Open Access•Carlos Julián Idrobo, F Berkes•Human Ecology•2012

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae