Divergent visions on the war in Ukraine
A corpus-assisted discourse study of speeches by Putin and Zelenskyy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24228455 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ruth Breeze (0000-0002-8132-225X, Universidad de Navarra), María Fernanda Novoa-Jaso (0000-0003-1858-8343, Universidad de Navarra) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 189-216 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-14 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Pragmatics & Beyond New Series (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/pbns.355.07bre |
| OpenAlex | W7154279033 |
| ISBN | 9789027234322 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 40 |
This chapter focuses on how Putin and Zelenskyy addressed world audiences in the first three months after the invasion of Ukraine by the Russian army in February 2022. Using quantitative semantic analysis, we obtain a broad picture of the topic areas covered by each leader’s speeches. Our data show that Putin devoted relatively little space to Ukraine in his speeches, and paid more attention to Russia’s economic and technological development. His language was highly future-oriented with a strong emphasis on his personal intentions and strategic goals, and a monologic style marked by an absence of negatives or attenuation. This approach may have been motivated by a desire to emphasize his personal authority, but also to insulate himself from negative consequences of the war. By contrast, Zelenskyy’s speeches centred almost entirely on the conflict, with graphic accounts of its effects. Zelenskyy’s speeches contain a much greater number of personal pronouns, particularly first person and allusions to “our people”, as well as more emotionally laden lexis. His discourse is often outward-directed, appealing to western countries and “the world” for solidarity with Ukraine. In conclusion, during the early months Putin tried to downplay the conflict and its possible consequences, employing euphemistic, non-emotional terms and merging his references to Ukraine into a wider, future-oriented discourse about Russia’s development. By contrast, Zelenskyy’s emotional discourse centred on conflict and the Russia-inflicted destruction, launching strong appeals to the rest of the world for support. These findings are discussed in relation to the two leaders’ goals, the pragma-rhetorical strategies used to communicate these to their target audiences.
Euphemism · Future Orientation · political speeches · presidential rhetoric · Russian invasion of Ukraine · Vladimir Putin · war discourse · Cultural and political discourse analysis · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Rhetoric and Communication Studies
Debating the Ukraine war in the German public
War-peace dialectic revisited
Modification of media’s visual identity as a response to the war in Ukraine
Vladimir Putin’s war rhetoric between cold reflection and furious hatred
The long, unsuccessful war
India’s war on its history of humiliation
Politicians and Rhetoric
Publication Bias in Psychology
The case for case in Putin’s speeches
A corpus study of negation and their disruptive patterns in political discourse
Words as weapons for mass persuasion
Untruthful claims, real war, dire consequences
Simulating pluralism
The Gender Divide in Election Campaign Interviews
Or so the government would have you believe”
Volodymyr Zelenskyy, heroic leadership, and the historical gaze
Putin and the Oligarchs
National Identity in Time of War
A Study of Vladimir Putin’s Rhetoric
Forged in the fires of war
Archetypal metaphor in rhetoric
How can computer-based methods help researchers to investigate news values in large datasets? A corpus linguistic study of the construction of newsworthiness in the reporting on Hurricane Katrina
Is this War
Analysing the language of political conflict
Ukraine at war
Putin
Towards an Antiwar Transnational Populism? An Analysis of the Construction of ‘the Russian People’ in Volodymyr Zelensky's Wartime Speeches
From key words to key semantic domains
Charismatic Mimicry
| Citations per year | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |