Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Changes From Pre- to Post-Dobbs in National Attitudes Toward Self-Managed Abortion Legality, Support, and Punishment

Bibliographic Data

ID24228941
AuthorsM Antonia Biggs (0000-0002-3904-3177), Rosalyn Schroeder (0000-0002-0206-7781), Shelly Kaller (0000-0002-6648-7064), Daniel Grossman (0000-0002-6878-6201), Lauren J Ralph
Year2026
Publication date2026-10-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWomen s Health Issues (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-3867 • E-ISSN: 1878-4321
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.whi.2026.08.008
PMID42844110
OpenAlexW7220836712
LanguageEN
References cited37

OBJECTIVE: We examined changes from before to after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, in national views on whether abortion, including self-managed abortion (SMA) and self-managed medication abortion (SMMA), should be legal or punished (reported to the police or child protective services [CPS], or imposed a fine or jail sentence). METHODS: From December 2021 to January 2022 (pre-Dobbs) and June to July 2023 (post-Dobbs), we administered two nationally representative cross-sectional online surveys to a market research firm's panel members who were assigned female at birth and aged 15 to 49. Using weighted logistic, multinomial, and general linear regression models with year as the primary independent variable, we assessed changes from pre- to post-Dobbs in views about the legality of facility-based abortion (procedural and medication abortion) and SMA methods, and whether those using SMA methods should be reported to the police or CPS, be fined, or be incarcerated. RESULTS: A total of 6,929 (2021-22) and 3,533 (2023) participants completed our primary outcome measures pre- and post-Dobbs. A growing proportion disagreed that medication abortion from a clinic/doctor's office should be illegal (pre-Dobbs: 59.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI) [58.1%, 61.5%]; post-Dobbs: 63.1%; 95% CI [60.9%, 65.4%]), although disagreement that SMMA should be illegal remained similar (pre-Dobbs: 42.8%; 95% CI [41.1%, 44.5%]; post-Dobbs: 43.4%; 95% CI [41.1%, 45.7%]). Support for reporting SMMA to the police (29.1%-23.7%, p < .001) or CPS (29.2%-24.2%, p < .001) or having someone pay a fine (25.2%-20.9%, p < .001) or go to jail (19.1%-16.1%, p < .001) decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest decreasing national support for making facility-based abortion illegal and for punishing people involved in SMA.

Abortion · abortion legality · abortion policy · Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization · Public opinion · self-managed abortion · International Human Rights and Reproductive Law · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Reproductive Health and Contraception

  • The role of community and culture in abortion perceptions, decisions, and experiences among Asian Americans

    Open Access•Sruthi Chandrasekaran, Katherine Key et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Medicalization as a social good? Lay perceptions about self-managed abortion, legality, and criminality

    Open Access•Andréa Becker, M Antonia Biggs et al.•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2024

  • County-Level Pregnancy Criminalization Rates and Prenatal Care Initiation and Utilization in Alabama, 2014–2022

    Open Access•Taylor Riley, Jaquelyn L Jahn et al.•Women s Health Issues•2026

  • Attitudes regarding the safety of in-clinic and self-managed abortion methods among the US general public in early 2022

    Open Access•Rosalyn Schroeder, Lauren Ralph et al.•Culture Health & Sexuality•2025

  • Complexity in Attitudes Toward Abortion Access

    Open Access•Kristen N Jozkowski, Brandon L Crawford et al.•Sexuality Research and Social…•2018

  • Attitudes Toward Abortion After Receiving vs. Being Denied an Abortion in the USA

    Open Access•Katie Woodruff, M Antonia Biggs et al.•Sexuality Research and Social…•2018

  • Safety and effectiveness of self‐managed abortion using misoprostol alone acquired from an online telemedicine service in the United States

    Open Access•Dana M Johnson, Mira Michels‐Gualtieri et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2023

  • Trust Women”

    Open Access•Angel M Foster, Alice Mark et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2024

  • How Familism and Hostile and Benevolent Sexism Shape Attitudes Toward Legal Abortion Among Latinx and non-Latinx Adults in the United States

    Open Access•Xiana Bueno, Beyza E Buyuker et al.•Sex Roles•2025

  • Examining Public Opinion about Abortion

    Open Access•Amy Adamczyk, Chunrye Kim et al.•Sociological Inquiry•2020

  • Self-Managed Medication Abortion

    Laura E Jacobson, Caitlin Gerdts•American Journal of Public Health•2025

  • Imagining Coat‐Hangers and Pills

    Open Access•Rosalyn Schroeder, Lori R Freedman et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2025

  • Abortion Attitudes

    Open Access•Douglas Osborne, Yanshu Huang et al.•Political Psychology•2022

  • The Struggle for Bodily Autonomy

    Susan Yanow•South Atlantic Quarterly•2024

  • Support for criminalization of self-managed abortion (SMA)

    Open Access•M Antonia Biggs, Andréa Becker et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2024

  • Migrant Generations and Abortion Circumstances

    Open Access•Xiana Bueno, María Montenegro et al.•Sociological Inquiry•2024

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae