Changes From Pre- to Post-Dobbs in National Attitudes Toward Self-Managed Abortion Legality, Support, and Punishment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24228941 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M Antonia Biggs (0000-0002-3904-3177), Rosalyn Schroeder (0000-0002-0206-7781), Shelly Kaller (0000-0002-6648-7064), Daniel Grossman (0000-0002-6878-6201), Lauren J Ralph |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Women s Health Issues (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-3867 • E-ISSN: 1878-4321 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.whi.2026.08.008 |
| PMID | 42844110 |
| OpenAlex | W7220836712 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 37 |
OBJECTIVE: We examined changes from before to after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, in national views on whether abortion, including self-managed abortion (SMA) and self-managed medication abortion (SMMA), should be legal or punished (reported to the police or child protective services [CPS], or imposed a fine or jail sentence). METHODS: From December 2021 to January 2022 (pre-Dobbs) and June to July 2023 (post-Dobbs), we administered two nationally representative cross-sectional online surveys to a market research firm's panel members who were assigned female at birth and aged 15 to 49. Using weighted logistic, multinomial, and general linear regression models with year as the primary independent variable, we assessed changes from pre- to post-Dobbs in views about the legality of facility-based abortion (procedural and medication abortion) and SMA methods, and whether those using SMA methods should be reported to the police or CPS, be fined, or be incarcerated. RESULTS: A total of 6,929 (2021-22) and 3,533 (2023) participants completed our primary outcome measures pre- and post-Dobbs. A growing proportion disagreed that medication abortion from a clinic/doctor's office should be illegal (pre-Dobbs: 59.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI) [58.1%, 61.5%]; post-Dobbs: 63.1%; 95% CI [60.9%, 65.4%]), although disagreement that SMMA should be illegal remained similar (pre-Dobbs: 42.8%; 95% CI [41.1%, 44.5%]; post-Dobbs: 43.4%; 95% CI [41.1%, 45.7%]). Support for reporting SMMA to the police (29.1%-23.7%, p < .001) or CPS (29.2%-24.2%, p < .001) or having someone pay a fine (25.2%-20.9%, p < .001) or go to jail (19.1%-16.1%, p < .001) decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest decreasing national support for making facility-based abortion illegal and for punishing people involved in SMA.
Abortion · abortion legality · abortion policy · Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization · Public opinion · self-managed abortion · International Human Rights and Reproductive Law · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Reproductive Health and Contraception
The role of community and culture in abortion perceptions, decisions, and experiences among Asian Americans
Medicalization as a social good? Lay perceptions about self-managed abortion, legality, and criminality
County-Level Pregnancy Criminalization Rates and Prenatal Care Initiation and Utilization in Alabama, 2014–2022
Attitudes regarding the safety of in-clinic and self-managed abortion methods among the US general public in early 2022
Complexity in Attitudes Toward Abortion Access
Attitudes Toward Abortion After Receiving vs. Being Denied an Abortion in the USA
Safety and effectiveness of self‐managed abortion using misoprostol alone acquired from an online telemedicine service in the United States
Trust Women”
How Familism and Hostile and Benevolent Sexism Shape Attitudes Toward Legal Abortion Among Latinx and non-Latinx Adults in the United States
Examining Public Opinion about Abortion
Self-Managed Medication Abortion
Imagining Coat‐Hangers and Pills
Abortion Attitudes
The Struggle for Bodily Autonomy
Support for criminalization of self-managed abortion (SMA)
Migrant Generations and Abortion Circumstances
| Highly cited | No |
|---|