Decentralization and Re-familialization in Informal Care
Adaptability and Inequalities in Social Care Policies in the Netherlands
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24229211 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gita Huijgen (0000-0002-6139-1776, Erasmus University Rotterdam), Tepora Emery (0000-0001-6137-9577, Erasmus University Rotterdam), Pearl A Dykstra (0000-0003-1518-1476, Erasmus University Rotterdam), M M Y de Klerk (0000-0001-8231-5054, The Netherlands Institute for Social Research , The Hague, 2594 AV) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-20 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1072-4745 • E-ISSN: 1468-2893 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/sp/jxag038 |
| OpenAlex | W7169790555 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 45 |
Reflecting wider European trends, Dutch policymakers have decentralized and re-familialized social care policy to reduce spending, potentially allowing for local disparities in access to formal care and informal care responsibilities. We examine the divergence in municipalities’ approaches to familialism (i.e., their support for and activation of informal caregivers), whether local demographic, cultural, political, and financial factors inform municipalities’ degree of familialism, and whether familialism relates to local social care take-up and expenditure. Analyzing survey data from 242 Dutch municipalities, we find some municipal variation in familialism, which is, however, not related to the local context, or to social care take-up or expenditure. Contrary to expectations, care take-up is lower in municipalities with higher care needs. Our findings suggest that decentralization does not deliver on its promise of adaptability and equality of outcomes when legal and budgetary restraints limit local policy discretion. Likewise, re-familialization does not necessarily reduce reliance on public care services.
care expenditure · care needs · Decentralization · familism · informal care · local inequality · municipalities · Netherlands · policy discretion · social care policy · Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Informal care in Europe
Religion and Families
Institutional Change in Long-Term Care
Revisiting the Nordic long-term care model for older people—still equal?
Coping with Permanent Austerity
Cost-containment long-term care policies for older people across the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Distances between couples and the man's and woman's parents
Can We Identify Intergenerational Policy Regimes in Europe
Varieties of familialism
From the Commodification to the Corporatization of Care
Ambiguous Policy Paradigms in the Dutch Welfare State
The care receivers perspective
Determinants of informal care‐giving in various social relationships in the Netherlands
The Netherlands
The Dutch Social Support Act in the shadow of the decentralization dream
Restructuring the welfare state
Social inequalities in facing old-age dependency
Varieties of familialism
Indicators of familialism and defamilialization in long-term care
Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes
Nordic eldercare – Weak universalism becoming weaker
Exploring the impact of austerity-driven policy reforms on the quality of the long-term care provision for older people in Belgium and the Netherlands
Facing the Challenges in the Development of Long-Term Care for Older People in Europe in the Context of an Economic Crisis
Socio-economic inequality in long-term care
From volunteer work to informal care by stealth
Changing long-term care provision at the local level in times of austerity – a qualitative study
Adult children stepping in? Long-term care reforms and trends in children's provision of household support to impaired parents in the Netherlands
The turn to optional familialism through the market
The New Politics of the Welfare State
The Politics of Blame Avoidance
Is decentralization good for your health? Transformations in the Italian NHS
Care as a Good for Social Policy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|