Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) S.M. Gaddis
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Department of Sociology, California Center for Population Research, University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
ANO 2019
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
ISSN 2332-6492
E-ISSN 2332-6506
EDITORA Annual Reviews (United States)
DOI 10.1177/2332649219870183
CITAÇÕES 11
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 a9c148b4b334c9a4d5f49de72d9f9426

Resumo

Researchers have used audit studies to provide causal evidence of racial discrimination for nearly 60 years. Although audits are an excellent methodological tool to investigate the 'what,' 'where,' and 'when' aspects of racial-ethnic discrimination, audits are less appropriate, by themselves, to investigate the 'how' and 'why' aspects of racial-ethnic discrimination. In this article, I review why audit studies are necessary to study racial-ethnic discrimination, the evidence from audit studies, and their limitations. I then argue that scholars should adopt a multimethod approach to audit studies to move from documenting the existence of racial-ethnic discrimination to examining how and why racial-ethnic discrimination occurs. Adoption of this multimethod approach will result in a deeper understanding of racial-ethnic discrimination with the potential to shape both opinions and policy surrounding discrimination.

Ferramentas