What is Armed Comfort?
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24233137 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Debayan Das (0009-0005-9800-3107, Presidency University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-20 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-12 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Critical Military Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2333-7486 • E-ISSN: 2333-7494 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23337486.2026.2747463 |
| OpenAlex | W7221573580 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 59 |
This article introduces Armed Comfort as a distinct mode of militarized governance through which armed authority is affectively normalized in everyday civilian life. It asks why visible militarization to some is so often experienced as reassuring rather than threatening. While critical military studies have richly examined militarization through fear, coercion, surveillance, ideology, and other enriching dimensions; this article foregrounds ‘affect’ as a mechanism through which militarized power endures. This article makes three interventions. First, building upon Feminist and Critical Military Studies’ analyzes of everyday militarization, it foregrounds ‘comfort’ as a specific affective mechanism of governance through which militarized authority is normalized in civilian life. Second, it develops the concept of armed comfort and identifies its key features. Third, it demonstrates how ‘comfort’ operates as a political technology that stabilizes militarized governance in civilian life. Lastly, it engages with the ambiguities that surround this concept. The article is primarily conceptual, drawing on repeated everyday encounters in Indian public infrastructure as illustrative sites rather than formal ethnographic cases. By theorizing reassurance as politically productive, the article extends critical military studies’ engagement with everyday militarization and its affective foundations.
Affect · civilian life · political technology · reassurance · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Military and Defense Studies · Military history and social perspectives
Militarization
Critique of Security
Ideology
The Military in the Political Development of New Nations
Understanding Deterrence
Critique of Security
The Relation between Authoritarianism and Acceptance of Military Ideology1
Necessary and surplus militarisation
The varieties of liberal militarism
Liberal militarism as insecurity, desire and ambivalence
Rethinking militarism as ideology
Introduction
Weaponizing Urban Development
Legitimising liberal militarism
The Affective Dimensions of Militarism in Schools
Armed Comfort
Military Ideology in Response to Democratic Pressure during the Late Suharto Era
The security sector in pursuit of legitimacy
Social Revolution and Authoritarian Durability
The Sublime Object of Militarism
Claiming the right to rule
Soldiering By Consent” and Military–Civil Relations
An ‘ironic compromise
Choosing to be the good wife
Power, Place, and Militarism
Keeping a feminist curiosity in critical military studies
State violence and queer identities
Land, terrain, territory
Security and Immigration
Policing insurgency
Affective atmospheres, urban geopolitics and conflict (de)escalation in Beirut
Gender, Militarization and Sovereignty
Urban military geographies
Why critical military studies needs to smash imperial white supremacist capitalist heteropatriarchy
What is Critical Military Studies
Re-thinking hegemonic masculinities in conflict-affected contexts
Can I Be Gay in the Army
The power of love
Deeply odd
Critical military studies, queer theory, and the possibilities of critique
Problematizing military masculinity, intersectionality and male vulnerability in feminist critical military studies
The recruiter and the sceptic
Experiences of Urban Militarism
Civilian Resistance Against the Military in Eastern DR Congo
When Life Itself is War
The Garrison State
| Highly cited | No |
|---|