Making the Rapallo boundary
Demarcation and the production of territorial fixity, 1920–1925
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24237010 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter Mikša (0000-0001-8336-0957) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 94 |
| Pages | 86-99 |
| Publication date | 2026-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Historical Geography (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0305-7488 • E-ISSN: 1095-8614 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jhg.2026.10.003 |
| OpenAlex | W7222967303 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 17 |
Treaties define borders in principle but do not produce lines on the ground. This article examines how the 1920 Treaty of Rapallo was translated into a material boundary between Italy and the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes by a joint demarcation commission working between 1921 and 1925. Drawing on the records of the Yugoslav demarcation bureau (Archives of Yugoslavia, fond 334), it asks how the sequence and institutional organisation of demarcation practices shaped the boundary that emerged. Three mechanisms are identified. Spatial calibration set the resolution at which the line could be fixed, as terrain, weather, and instruments determined attainable precision. Institutional filtration determined which forms of local knowledge could become operative, as petitions shaped agendas and proposals but altered the line only when translated into the commission’s technical mandate or raised to interstate negotiation. Bilateral certification bound stones to protocols and maps, so that alteration ceased to be a routine administrative act and required renewed interstate agreement. Demarcation is analysed as a cumulative process of closure through which a spatially underdetermined treaty formula became a boundary whose location and legitimate procedures of alteration were progressively restricted.
1920s · boundary-making · Italian-French border · territorial demarcation · Historical Geography and Geographical Thought · Migration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography · World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Applying Friedrich Ratzel's political and biogeography to the debate on natural borders in the Italian context (1880–1920)
How Should We Do the History of Territory
The Politics of (Un)fixity and the Vernacularisation of Borders
Bridging central state and local communities' territorial visions
An intra-imperial conflict
Pillars and perspective
Politics and scale in boundary-making
Bordering, Ordering and Othering
Categories, borders and boundaries
The role of the Irish boundary commission in the entrenchment of the Irish border
Exploring the Critical Potential of the Borderscapes Concept
The rise of linear borders in world politics
Prosaic geographies of stateness
Rethinking Territory
Locating the territoriality of territory in border studies
Recent geohistorical research on boundary-making. Challenging conventional narratives on borders and modern state-building
The Limits of the State
| Highly cited | No |
|---|