Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Video-mediated interaction reduces cultural differences in conversational backchanneling

Bibliographic Data

ID24237157
AuthorsM B Söderman (0000-0002-3842-0540), S Lepistö (0009-0005-0856-741X), Emmi Koskinen (0000-0001-5469-2047), P Heikkinen (0000-0003-4803-0041), Mariel Wuolio (0000-0002-2600-7484), A Sinisalo, A Peräkylä, N Ravaja, Jan Lindstrom (0000-0002-7849-3816), Ville Harjunen (0000-0003-2046-0488)
Year2026
Volume266
Pages142-156
Publication date2026-12-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Pragmatics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0378-2166 • E-ISSN: 1879-1387
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.pragma.2026.10.002
OpenAlexW7223065802
LanguageEN
References cited36

Backchanneling is a core interactional practice through which listeners display attention, engagement, and affiliation during a conversation. While backchannels are used among most language communities, prior research suggests systematic variation across language groups in frequency, type and timing of these actions. However, following the rapid expansion of video-mediated interaction, it has become evident that video-calling constricts provision of well-timed listener feedback. It is therefore increasingly important to understand how sociocultural differences in backchanneling are reshaped under such technological constraints. In the present study, we examined backchanneling behavior during first encounters among 154 Finnish-speaking and Swedish-speaking Finns, representing relatively low- and high-engagement cultures, respectively. Dyads were randomly assigned to either face-to-face or video-call. We analyzed multiple forms of backchanneling (lexical and non-lexical vocalizations, and nods), examining their frequencies both across the entire interaction and minute by minute. Consistent with prior work, Swedish speakers exhibited higher rates of backchanneling than Finnish speakers in face-to-face interaction. However, these sociocultural differences were substantially reduced during video-calling. Especially non-lexical backchannels and nodding showed clear language-related differences in face-to-face settings that attenuated in video calls. Time-course analyses further revealed that the technologically contingent sociocultural differences in backchanneling were relatively stable across conversation, especially when it comes to nodding. Together, the findings suggest that video-calling constrains interactional timing and multimodal signaling in ways that reduce sociocultural variability in backchanneling. This suggests that the expansion of video-calling may place high- and low-engagement cultures in unequal positions, disproportionately constraining the more expansive backchanneling practices characteristic of higher–engagement interaction style.

backchanneling · Face-to-face interaction · first encounters · listener feedback · multimodal signaling · nodding · sociocultural differences · Swedish-speaking Finns · video calls · Digital Communication and Language · Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies

  • Social participation and health in a community rich in stock of social capital

    Markku T Hyyppä•Health Education Research•2003

  • Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation

    Open Access•Melanie S Brucks, Jonathan Levav•Nature•2022

  • Multimodal Language Processing in Human Communication

    Open Access•Judith Holler, C Levinson et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2019

  • A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference

    A Colin Cameron, Douglas L Miller•The Journal of Human Resources•2015

  • Working to keep aligned in psychotherapy

    Peter Muntigl, Naomi Knight et al.•Language and Dialogue•2012

  • Socializing While Alone

    Open Access•Roy F Baumeister, Michaela T Bibby et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2026

  • Non-lexical conversational sounds in American English

    Nigel Ward•Pragmatics & Cognition•2006

  • Modulating troubles affiliating in initial interactions

    Open Access•Natalie Flint, Michael Haugh et al.•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2019

  • Variation in address practices across languages and nations

    Open Access•Camilla Wide, Heimo Lappalainen et al.•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2019

  • Co-Constructing Non-Mutual Realities

    Open Access•Karen Ruhleder, Brigitte Jordan•Computer Supported Cooperative…•2001

  • The Embodied and Negotiated Production of Assessments in Instructed Actions

    L Mondada•Research on Language and Social…•2009

  • Video-in-Interaction

    C Licoppe, J Morel•Research on Language and Social…•2012

  • Towards a multimodal approach for analysing interpreter's management of rapport challenge in onsite and video remote interpreting

    Open Access•Dries Cavents, July De Wilde et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2024

  • Self-disclosure in initial interactions amongst speakers of American and Australian English

    Michael Haugh, Donal Carbaugh•Multilingua•2015

  • Eliciting talk as language socialization in Finnish, SwedishFinnish and Swedish families

    Marja-Terttu Tryggvason, Marja‐terttu Tryggvason et al.•Multilingua•2002

  • Between and within

    Open Access•Charles Goodwin•Human Studies•1986

  • Nods, vocal continuers, and the perception of empathy in storytelling

    L Voutilainen, Pentti Henttonen et al.•Discourse Processes•2019

  • Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology

    Open Access•Mark I Appelbaum, Mark Appelbaum et al.•American Psychologist•2018

  • Why are you so slow? – Misattribution of transmission delay to attributes of the conversation partner at the far-end

    Open Access•Katrin Schoenenberg, Alexander Raake et al.•International Journal of…•2014

  • Backchannel responses as strategic responses in bilingual speakers’ conversations

    Open Access•Matthias Heinz, Bettina Heinz•Journal of Pragmatics•2003

  • Giving and receiving advice in higher education. Comparing Sweden-Swedish and Finland-Swedish supervision meetings

    Open Access•Sofie Henricson, Marie Nelson•Journal of Pragmatics•2017

  • Scopes of recipiency

    Open Access•Tom Koole, Myrte N Gosen•Journal of Pragmatics•2024

  • Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in English and Japanese

    Open Access•Nigel G Ward, Nigel Ward et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2000

  • Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling

    T Stivers•Research on Language and Social…•2008

  • Addressee backchannels steer narrative development

    Open Access•Jackson Tolins, Jean E Fox Tree•Journal of Pragmatics•2014

  • Linguistic functions of head movements in the context of speech

    Open Access•Evelyn Z Mcclave, Evelyn Mcclave•Journal of Pragmatics•2000

  • Whose turn is it anyway? Latency and the organization of turn-taking in video-mediated interaction

    Open Access•Lucas M Seuren, Joseph Wherton et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2021

  • Nodding, aizuchi, and final particles in Japanese conversation

    Open Access•Sachiko Kita, Sotaro Kita et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2007

  • A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation

    Open Access•Harvey Sacks, Emanuel A Schegloff et al.•Language•2025

  • On the structure of speaker-auditor interaction during speaking turns

    Open Access•Starkey Duncan•Language in Society•1974

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae