Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sustainable rural settlements in question

Testing synergy and processes within the agricultural transition–human capital–amenities nexus in Northeast China

Bibliographic Data

ID24237306
AuthorsBonoua Faye (0000-0003-4465-6792), Guoming Du (0009-0004-7028-8852), Rui Zhang (0000-0003-0194-5295), Yuheng Li (0000-0002-7449-511X)
Year2027
Volume129
Pages104479
Publication date2027-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Rural Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0743-0167 • E-ISSN: 1873-1392
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104479
OpenAlexW7223033971
LanguageEN
References cited77

Enhancing rural sustainability has become a prominent issue in the global academic debate, calling for a synergistic framework that integrates multiple dimensions of rural development. Therefore, this study develops the Agricultural Transition- Human Capital- Amenities (ACA) nexus model to explain how these three dimensions jointly contribute to and advance the theoretical framework of Sustainable Rural Settlement (SRS). Agricultural transition creates economic opportunities and supports human capital development, which in turn improves rural amenities and living conditions, ultimately promoting SRS. This research focuses on Heilongjiang Province in Northeast China, a key region for food security that faces several challenges. It examines the contradiction between agricultural modernization and sustainable rural development using panel data from 2003 to 2022. The Coupling Coordination Degree Model (CCDM) is used to measure synergy within the ACA nexus, while Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MM-QREG) identifies the heterogeneous drivers of SRS across different levels of development. The results demonstrate a convergent yet uneven sustainability trajectory across regions, with SRS scores increasing from 2003 to 2022. Despite overall progress, persistent disparities remained, as Mudanjiang consistently outperformed Heihe throughout the study period. This convergence was primarily driven by agricultural modernization after 2012, whereas improvements in amenities and living conditions lagged, revealing structural imbalances within the ACA nexus. Quantile regression results highlight mechanization, education, and village planning as key determinants, with education's effect strengthening and planning's diminishing along sustainability gradients. Rural income exhibited only negative associations rather than causal impacts, while Granger tests indicated limited short-term causality. This highlights the necessity of incorporating place-based rural policies that should no longer be sectoral to tackle multifunctional rural challenges.

agricultural modernization · agricultural transformation · Food security · Heilongjiang · Human capital · Northeast China · Regional disparities · rural amenities · rural education · rural mechanization · rural policy · rural sustainability · village planning · Regional Development and Environment · Rural Development and Agriculture · Rural development and sustainability

  • Rural decline and revitalization in China

    Open Access•Yang Zhou, Mengmin Sun•Journal of Rural Studies•2026

  • Modernity

    Open Access•G K Bhambra•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • The process and driving forces of rural hollowing in China under rapid urbanization

    Open Access•Yansui Liu, Yu Liu et al.•Journal of Geographical Sciences•2010

  • Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels

    Open Access•Elena-Ivona Dumitrescu, Christophe Hurlin•Economic Modelling•2012

  • A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors

    Open Access•Robert M O’brien•Quality & Quantity•2007

  • Panel Cointegration

    Peter Pedroni•Econometric Theory•2004

  • Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data

    Open Access•Chihwa Kao•Journal of Econometrics•1999

  • A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence

    Open Access•M Hashem Pesaran•Journal of Applied Econometrics•2007

  • Infrastructure That Connects/Infrastructure That Divides

    Lisa K Bates, Matti Siemiatycki et al.•Planning Theory & Practice•2023

  • Examining the impact of human capital and innovation on farm productivity in the KwaZulu-Natal North Coast, South Africa

    Open Access•Lloyd J S Baiyegunhi•Agrekon•2024

  • An assessment framework of amenities and its impact on population patterns in China's border cities

    Open Access•Jing Guan, Zhouying Song et al.•Applied Geography•2025

  • Urban economic resilience and human capital

    Open Access•Qian Zhou, Zhipeng Qi•Sustainable Cities and Society•2023

  • Urban Sustainable Development Assessment and Early Warning Oriented to Support-Constraint Dynamic Evolution

    Open Access•Xuesong Zhan, Huize Zhang et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2025

  • Sustainable development assessment of city clusters based on society-water-energy-environment nexus

    Open Access•Haoyuan Liu, Jijun Xu et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2026

  • Dynamic Variation of Ecosystem Services Value under Land Use/Cover Change in the Black Soil Region of Northeastern China

    Open Access•Quanfeng Li, Lu Wang et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • The impact of rural human capital on household energy consumption structure

    Open Access•Xiu‐qing Li, Hui Mao et al.•Sustainable Futures•2024

  • A holistic framework for evaluating and planning sustainable rural drinking water projects in sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Ornit Avidar•Journal of Rural Studies•2024

  • Identification of the human-land relationship involved in the urbanization of rural settlements in Wuhan city circle, China

    Open Access•Siyang Zhu, Xuesong Kong et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2020

  • Revisiting agricultural modernisation

    Open Access•Suvi Huttunen•Journal of Rural Studies•2019

  • Rurality as context for innovative responses to social challenges – The role of rural social enterprises

    Open Access•Lucas Olmedo, Mara van Twuijver et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2021

  • The end of the idyll? Post-crisis conservation and amenity migration in natural protected areas

    Open Access•Jose A Cortes-Vazquez, Juan José Cortés Vázquez•Journal of Rural Studies•2017

  • Assessing the impact of improved agricultural technologies on household income in rural Mozambique

    Open Access•Benedito Cunguara, Ika Darnhofer•Food Policy•2011

  • Sanitation and work time

    Open Access•Dongqin Wang, Yanni Shen•World Development•2022

  • Agricultural modernization and redistributive conflict

    Open Access•Stefano Falcone, Michele Rosenberg•Journal of Development Economics•2025

  • The measurement of agricultural disaster vulnerability in China and implications for land-supported agricultural resilience building

    Open Access•Yuheng Li, Guangya Gao et al.•Land Use Policy•2025

  • An integrated framework for measuring sustainable rural development towards the SDGs

    Open Access•Dianfeng Liu, Fuxiang Li et al.•Land Use Policy•2024

  • Decoding the formation mechanisms of rural settlements expansion patterns in transitional China

    Open Access•Wanxu Chen, Binqiao Duan et al.•Land Use Policy•2025

  • Quantitative assessment of cultivated land use intensity in Heilongjiang Province, China, 2001–2015

    Open Access•Xiaoliang Li, Kening Wu et al.•Land Use Policy•2023

  • Spatial pattern evolution of rural settlements from 1961 to 2030 in Tongzhou District, China

    Open Access•Wei Song, Huanhuan Li•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Thriving in turbulent times

    Open Access•Tina N Bauer, Tina Bauer et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Evolutionary process and mechanism of population hollowing out in rural villages in the farming-pastoral ecotone of Northern China

    Open Access•Qi Wen, Jin Li et al.•Land Use Policy•2023

  • Enhancing agricultural production and environmental benefits through full mechanization

    Open Access•Zhou Zhou, Zina A et al.•Habitat International•2025

  • Culture-led rural revitalisation in China

    Open Access•J Qian, Yanheng Lu et al.•Habitat International•2025

  • What constrains impoverished rural regions

    Open Access•Wenhao Wu, Yuheng Li et al.•Habitat International•2022

  • Can capable village cadres promote rural revitalization? An empirical study based on 611 village-level data from Shandong Province, China

    Open Access•Jiawei Wang, Xia Kuang et al.•Habitat International•2025

  • Spatial optimization of rural settlements in ecologically fragile regions

    Open Access•Jingbo Yin, Dongyan Wang et al.•Habitat International•2023

  • Understanding the “conflict-coordination” theoretical model of regional land use transitions

    Open Access•Bailin Zhang, Jinhua Zhai et al.•Habitat International•2024

  • Optimizing rural settlements in China through rural system resilience and socio-spatial kinships

    Open Access•Yiwei Geng, Xiaoshun Li et al.•Habitat International•2026

  • Synergies and trade-offs in the food-energy-water nexus of rural households

    Open Access•Ming‐hsun Wu, Mengrong Wu et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2026

  • Integrating sustainability and productivity

    Open Access•Frederico Pereira Tenchini, Fábio De Oliveira Paula et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2025

  • Rural Revitalization in China

    Open Access•Zhongqi Feng, Guy M Robinson et al.•Geography Compass•2025

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae