A Critical Evaluation of Karma Yoga Scales Through a Systematic Literature Review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24237707 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Aastha Rana (0000-0002-1954-8557, Centre of Excellence for the Science of Happiness, Delhi Technological University, New Delhi, India), Vikas Gupta (0000-0003-0975-336X, Delhi Technological University), Naval Garg (Department of Management Studies, Netaji Subhash Institute of Technology, Dwarka, Delhi, India), Shivantika Sharad (0000-0002-5562-9936, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-19 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0971-6858 • E-ISSN: 0973-0737 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/09716858261489914 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 56 |
Karma yoga is a yogic path outlined in the Bhagavad Gita and is extremely relevant in today’s world. This systematic review provides a comprehensive analysis of the available karma yoga scales. It evaluated 9 karma yoga scales against 11 criteria to guide future researchers in making informed choices. The analysis covered key attributes such as the conceptual framework and dimensionality of the scales, item development processes, sample design and context, along with their reliability and validity. Results reveal that the scales are based on varied theoretical frameworks, lacking consensus. The early scales lack a rigorous theoretical basis and may not be psychometrically sound. The latter scales, with a good theoretical and psychometric basis, are recommended for use. All scales are five- or seven-point Likert scales and are easy to administer, score and interpret. The study identified seven primary limitations in the existing karma yoga scales: a lack of consistency in conceptual propositions and dimensionality, a lack of a rigorous basis for a framework, low reliability, dominance of self-reported scales, inadequate content validity assessment, ineptness in the method of scale composition and lack of cross-cultural validation and adaptation. Based on these gaps, specific directions for future research aimed at strengthening the conceptual clarity and psychometric robustness of karma yoga measurement are outlined. Moreover, its implications in the workplace and mental health contexts are given to enhance employee well-being and performance.
A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
Response Burden and Questionnaire Length
Workplace spirituality and employee work attitudes
The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior
Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments
Cross Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of Research Instruments
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
The content validity index
A Systematic Literature Review of Karma Yoga
Conducting cross-cultural, multi-lingual or multi-country scale development and validation in health care research
A Semester of Hatha Yoga Has Comparable Effects to Physical Education for Children in Terms of Physical Activity and Psychosocial Indicators
Contextualized Measurement Scale Adaptation
Karma-Yoga, the Indian Work Ideal, and its Relationship with Empathy
Transformational Leadership and Karma-Yoga
Karma Yoga
The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Followers' Duty Orientation and Spirituality
Workplace Spirituality and Employee Well-being
Do Karma-Yogis Make Better Leaders
Impact of Guna s and Karma Yoga on Transformational Leadership
Towards a Conceptualization of Karma Yoga
Rational devotion and human perfection
Consumers' Attitudes Toward Energy Conservation
Scale Development Research
| Highly cited | No |
|---|