Modularising the adjudicative encounter
Procedural differentiation and institutional continuity in Chinese online litigation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24239178 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lingxiang Chen (0009-0009-9192-8878) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-22 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Oñati Socio-legal Series (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2079-5971 • E-ISSN: 2079-5971 |
| Publisher | Onati International Institute for the Sociology of Law (PUBLISHER • ES) |
| DOI | 10.35295/osls.iisl.2767 |
| OpenAlex | W7223175017 |
| References cited | 21 |
Online adjudication is often analysed through contrasts between physical and remote participation, or through the coexistence of online and offline modes. This article examines a more granular institutional transformation: how procedural rules make components of the adjudicative encounter separately configurable while preserving their legal continuity. Using a theory-informed socio-legal documentary analysis of Chinese online-litigation rules from 2018–2022, the article identifies three linked patterns: regulated separability across participants and procedural stages; bounded temporal separability for selected activities; and selective institutional reconstitution through authentication, spatial and role qualification, procedural classification, and common records. These findings support the concept of the modularisation of adjudicative space. Modularisation is distinguished from hybridity and procedural-justice evaluation: it identifies the rule-governed relationship between procedural differentiation and institutional continuity. China is used as a theory-revealing institutional case, not as a universal model of digital justice.
Artificial Intelligence in Law · Dispute Resolution and Class Actions · Education, Law, and Society
Transforming attendance at the International Criminal Court
Why People Obey the Law
Double normalization
Risk and danger in the introduction of algorithms to courts
Designing technology for legal work
Presence and participation in a virtual court
Remote judging
Propaganda Work in Chinese Courts
A new way to justice? Multimodal meaning construction in videoconferencing technology-based online criminal courts in China
Exclusion in the interests of inclusion
The Unbearable Lightness of Being? Shifts Towards the Virtual Trial
Remote rituals in virtual courts
Presence, Proximity and Participation
Virtual Justice Rituals
Unfamiliarity and Procedural Justice
| Highly cited | No |
|---|