Gender roles in maize food systems
A case of smallholder farmers in rural Malawi
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24239386 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Victor Munkhuwa (Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources), Chimwemwe Chilenga (Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources), Yananda Mandhlopa (Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources), Tinna Ng’ong’ola-Manani (Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources), Agnes Mbachi Mwangwela (Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources), Kingsley George Masamba (Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-21 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2297-7775 • E-ISSN: 2297-7775 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fsoc.2026.1938286 |
| OpenAlex | W7223157604 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 41 |
The purpose of this study was to determine gender roles of smallholder farmers in maize food systems of rural Malawi. Gender roles and perception levels in the maize food system were assessed using a convergent mixed methods research design whereby both qualitative and quantitative approaches were used. Results showed that the majority of members in farmer groups and cooperatives (85%), loan beneficiaries (59%), and farm inputs beneficiaries (64%) are men. This means that males are the dominant gender in the farmer groups and cooperatives and that they have an upper hand in terms of accessing resources that are critical for maize production when compared to women. Men take a major role in deciding on how to access farm inputs (54%) and how to use the farm inputs (50%). Men and women jointly take major roles in deciding on the type of seed to grow (40%) and on the use of loan money (35%). This shows that men take the lead in decision-making processes of their households. Furthermore, women are less involved than men when it comes to implementing activities during the maize production, processing, and distribution stages. However, there is higher involvement of women than men when it comes to activities during the maize consumption stage. The correlation test has shown weak linkages and little influence between the maize food system stages. Stakeholders should promote adequate gender integration in all the maize food system stages to ensure equal participation and benefits for men and women and improve food security.
Agricultural Development and Management · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs—Principles and Practices
Does joint agricultural decision-making improve food security among smallholder farmers
Can agricultural subsidies reduce gendered productivity gaps? Panel data evidence from Zambia
Income inequality and distribution patterns in the cassava value chain in the Oyo State, Nigeria
Agricultural Commercialisation and Food Security in Rural Economies
Does Women’s Empowerment Matter for Household Food Security? Evidence From Northern Ghana
Discriminatory effects of gender disparities in improved seed and fertilizer use at the plot-level in Malawi and Tanzania
How local gender norms and intra-household dynamics shape women’s demand for laborsaving technologies
Women's empowerment and its role in household food security to achieve SDGs
Gender equality and sustainable development
Agricultural market access and dietary diversity in Kenya
Economic performance, gender and social networks in West African food systems
What Explains Gender Gaps in Household Food Security? Evidence from Maize Farm Households in Southern Ethiopia
| Highly cited | No |
|---|