Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessing the adequacy of compensation practices for expropriation in Uganda using the capability approach

Bibliographic Data

ID24241433
AuthorsNassir Mwanje (University of Nairobi), Mary W Kimani (University of Nairobi), Erastus K Museleku (University of Nairobi)
Year2026
Pages1-12
Publication date2026-10-23
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDevelopment in Practice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0961-4524 • E-ISSN: 1364-9213
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09614524.2026.2744306
OpenAlexW7223309685
LanguageEN
References cited26

Determining fair compensation in expropriation has been a considerable challenge, especially in developing economies like Uganda, leading to prolonged disputes, opposition, and impoverishment of those affected. The capability approach has been presented as a solution to this problem; therefore, this study assessed the adequacy of land expropriation compensation in Uganda using the capability approach, drawing on data from project-affected persons. The findings indicate that demographics like age, education levels, household size and financial considerations are crucial in rural agrarian communities, highlighting the need for personalised and customised compensation packages based on the capability approach.

Capability approach · compensation practices · Expropriation · land acquisition · Property rights · Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact · Land Rights and Reforms · Property Rights and Legal Doctrine

  • Handbook for Preparing a Resettlement Action Plan

    International Finance Corporation•Handbook for preparing a…•2002

  • The economics of involuntary resettlement

    Michael M Cernea•The economics of involuntary…•1999

  • A Theory of Justice

    John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1971

  • Two Sides of the Coin

    Open Access•Gideon Baffoe, Vincent Manirakiza et al.•Urban Forum•2025

  • Large Dams

    Open Access•Thayer Scudder•Large Dams•2019

  • Involuntary Resettlement Sourcebook

    World Bank•Involuntary resettlement•2004

  • Theory of Social Justice and Involuntary Resettlement

    Open Access•Madhu Bala•Indian Journal of Human Development•2008

  • Who Gains and Who Loses from Compensated Displacement from Protected Areas? The Case of the Derema Corridor, Tanzania

    Open Access•Salla Rantala, SallaE Rantala et al.•Conservation and Society•2013

  • Changing concepts of ‘land’ in economic theory

    Open Access•Klaus Hubacek, J C J M Van Den Bergh•Ecological Economics•2006

  • Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements

    Martha C Nussbaum, Martha Nussbaum•Feminist Economics•2003

  • The risks and reconstruction model for resettling displaced populations

    Open Access•Michael M Cernea, Michael Cernea•World Development•1997

  • Fundamental Functionings of Landowners

    Open Access•Jyoti Rao•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice

    Open Access•I Robeyns•Wellbeing, Freedom and Social…•2017

  • Women and Human Development

    Open Access•Martha C Nussbaum, Martha Nussbaum•Women and Human Development•2000

  • Risks and Reconstruction

    Michael M Cernea, Christopher Mcdowell•Risks and Reconstruction•2000

  • Securing land rights for women

    Elizabeth Daley, Birgit Englert•Journal of Eastern African Studies•2010

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae