Archaeological Heritage Management and the Post-Valetta Scenario in the Netherlands
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2425111 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Laia Colomer (0000-0003-3353-8969, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 125-131 |
| Publication date | 2012-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Heritage & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2159-032X • E-ISSN: 2159-0338 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1179/hso.2012.5.1.125 |
| OpenAlex | W2042734639 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
Reverse Archaeology propones archaeological knowledge as a source of inspiration for spatial planningdesign, aiming to give a practical output to research paid by developers when an area is affected by archaeologicalresources not suitable for in situ preservation and public enhance. The response shows that it provides a tool forimplementing Dutch Belvedere programme but does not actually give a comprehensive answer to the fullmanagement of archaeological heritage, as is stated by the authors. Nevertheless, some positive points asserted byReverse Archaeology, such as decision-making process and stakeholder participation, are both critique commentedand encouraged for further work moving the discussion from spatial planning utilizing the past, to a more generalremark on the need of applying valued-based heritage management methods to the European post-Valetta scenario
Archaeology · Geography · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · History
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |