Self-Determination and Confidentiality
The Ambiguous Nature of Decision-Making
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2429324 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Catherine Saxon (0000-0001-6932-7253), George A Jacinto, Sophia F Dziegielewski (0000-0002-2592-8038) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 55-72 |
| Publication date | 2006-07-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1091-1359 • E-ISSN: 1540-3556 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1300/j137v13n04_04 |
| OpenAlex | W2654259606 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 4 |
This article seeks to further clarify the ambiguous nature of two of social work's most important values: self-determination and confidentiality. Previous research indicates that many ethical decisions in social work practice are difficult to make; and, many times decisions are made based on the worker's values and experiences rather than on written ethics, laws, and agency policy. To explore this concept further, an open-ended survey instrument was distributed to 82 social work students after completing the required practice classes. The participants were asked whether they would break confidentiality based on a specific vignette and describe what decision was made and why. Results indicated that degree level (MSW versus BSW) proved to be a significant factor related to whether and/or why the respondent would break confidentiality. In addition, students with more paid work experience were more likely to question the issue of confidentiality and were more likely to break it. Two issues reflected in the decision-making process involved ensuring client safety and self-determination. In conclusion, this article explores possible reasons for breaching confidentiality and pitfalls that can occur for all professionals in making these types of decisions. Furthermore, it explores the ambiguous nature of problem solving in this area, and suggests ways that social workers can improve their decision-making skills
Agency (philosophy · Confidentiality · Ethical decision · Political science · Process (computing · Public relations · Respondent · Sociology · Vignette · Work (physics · Computer Science · Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work · Law · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,07 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2011 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |