Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What 'We

Bibliographic Data

ID2436465
AuthorsHolly Lawford‐smith (0000-0001-6352-7377, University of Sheffield, corresponding author), Holly Lawford-Smith (1University of Sheffield and Australian National University, Victoria Street, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK, e-mail: [email protected])
Year2015
Volume1
Issue2
Pages225-249
Publication date2015-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Social Ontology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2196-9663 • E-ISSN: 2196-9655
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/jso-2015-0008
OpenAlexW4234314112
LanguageEN
Citations received26
References cited10

The objective of this paper is to explain why certain authors - both popular and academic - are making a mistake when they attribute obligations to uncoordinated groups of persons, and to argue that it is particularly unhelpful to make this mistake given the prevalence of individuals faced with the difficult question of what morality requires of them in a situation in which there is a good they can bring about together with others, but not alone. I will defend two alternatives to attributing obligations to uncoordinated groups. The first solution has us build better people, who will coordinate their actions willingly and spontaneously when the occasion arises. The second solution has us build better groups, so that when the occasion arises, there is a framework in place for coordinating members into action

Action (physics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Mistake · Morality · Political science · Sociology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Free Will and Agency · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Global obligations, collective capacities, and ‘ought implies can’

    Open Access•Bill Wringe•Philosophical Studies•2020

  • Collective Responsibility Gaps

    Open Access•Collin, Stephanie Collins•Journal of Business Ethics•2019

  • Group motivation

    Open Access•Jessica Brown•Noûs•2022

  • Collective moral agency and self-induced moral incapacity

    Open Access•Niels De Haan•Philosophical Explorations•2023

  • Scope of Epistemic Reparations

    Open Access•Paul-Mikhail Catapang Podosky•Social Epistemology•2026

  • Joint Abilities

    Open Access•Maike Albertzart•Erkenntnis•2026

  • Abilities and Obligations

    Open Access•Collin, Stephanie Collins•Erkenntnis•2023

  • On the Relation Between Collective Responsibility and Collective Duties

    Open Access•Niels De Haan•Philosophy•2021

  • Group agents, moral competence and duty-bearers

    Open Access•Niels De Haan•Philosophical Studies•2023

  • Does being a ‘bad feminist’ make me a hypocrite? Politics, commitments and moral consistency

    Open Access•Adam Piovarchy•Philosophical Studies•2023

  • The problem of insignificant hands

    Open Access•Frank Hindriks•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • What can we do? Collective ability, and co-agential capacity

    Open Access•Bill Wringe•Philosophical Studies•2026

  • When to Start Saving the Planet

    Open Access•Frank Hindriks•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2023

  • Complex Collective Duties & Action-Guidance

    Open Access•Cristián Rettig•Kriterion Revista de Filosofia•2023

  • Cooperative duties of efficiency and efficacy

    Open Access•Niels De Haan•Journal of Global Ethics•2022

  • Towards an action-guiding theory of human rights

    Cristián Rettig•Journal of Global Ethics•2023

  • Are ‘the affluent’ responsible for global poverty

    Open Access•Holly Lawford‐smith•Ethics & Global Politics•2019

  • Understanding complicity

    Mihaela Mihai•Critical Review of International…•2019

  • Does Purchasing Make Consumers Complicit in Global Labour Injustice

    Open Access•Holly Lawford‐smith, Holly Lawford-Smith•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2017

  • The Universal Scope of Positive Duties Correlative to Human Rights

    Open Access•Marinella Capriati•Utilitas•2018

  • The pervasive structure of society

    Open Access•Tim Syme, Timothy Syme•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2018

  • Collective deception

    Open Access•Cayla Clinkenbeard•Synthese•2023

  • Doing your part

    Open Access•Rosemary Mellor•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2025

  • The Claims and Duties of Socioeconomic Human Rights

    Collin, Stephanie Collins•The Philosophical Quarterly•2016

  • Responsibility for states' actions

    Open Access•Holly Lawford‐smith, Collin et al.•Philosophy Compass•2017

  • Three Conceptions of Group-Based Reasons

    Open Access•Christopher Woodard•Journal of Social Ontology•2017

  • Can a Random Collection of Individuals be Morally Responsible?

    Virginia Held•The Journal of Philosophy•1970

  • Joint Duties and Global Moral Obligations

    Open Access•Anne Schwenkenbecher•Ratio•2013

  • Give it up for climate change

    Open Access•Edward A Page•International Theory•2012

  • Joint Actions and Group Agents

    Open Access•Philip Pettit, David P Schweikard et al.•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2006

Unique citing works26
Citations per year2,6
Citation span2016 - 2026 (11)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 26
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae