The Early History of Syphilis: A Reappraisal
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
ANO | 1969 |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | American Anthropologist |
ISSN | 0002-7294 |
E-ISSN | 0002-7294 |
EDITORA | Wiley (United States) |
DOI | 10.1525/aa.1969.71.2.02a00020 |
CITAÇÕES | 12 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
4d0b6e2988afc2d49a15291b8c94c80a
|
Resumo
The historical record and examination of disinterred human bones indicate that venereal syphilis is very old in America but did not appear in the Old World until about 1500. Traditionally it has been believed that the disease was brought to the Old World by Columbus in the 1490s. The most popular alternative hypothesis at present is that venereal syphilis is really only one facet of a disease—treponematosis, appearing as yaws in the tropics, nonvenereal syphilis in the Middle East, pinta in Mexico, etc.—that is present wherever man has settled and has been his unshakable companion for thousands of years in all the continents. Unfortunately, the latter, or Unitarian, theory has no more claim to validity than the Columbian. The diseases mentioned are similar but we cannot be sure that they are all really the same. And the testimony of the sixteenth‐century Spaniards, who knew Columbus and his men, that syphilis was an American import cannot be easily brushed aside. The hypothesis of this paper is that treponematosis, originally a single disease, evolved into several related but distinct maladies as man spread through the world and that venereal syphilis is the variant that developed in the remote cul‐de‐sac of America, from which it probably was indeed introduced to Europe with the return of Columbus.