Industrial Anthropology
Conditions of Revival
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2473754 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David G Moore (0000-0003-3496-0846) |
| Year | 1988 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 5-18 |
| Publication date | 1988-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | City & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0893-0465 • E-ISSN: 1548-744X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1525/city.1988.2.1.5 |
| OpenAlex | W2117562674 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 5 |
Anthropologists Made Major Contributions to management and organization research in business and industry in the 1930s, 1940s, and early 1950s. Since then, anthropologists have largely disappeared from the mainstream of management and organization research in business and industry. This paper examines the conditions that prevailed during the initial flourishing of industrial anthropology and asks whether the prominent role that it once occupied can be revived. The answer of this author is, maybe. While past conditions can never be repeated, there are interesting trends that may open the door for a revival. [management, organization research, industrial anthropology, business
Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture · Management and Organizational Studies · Management Theory and Practice
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,14 |
| Citation span | 1991 - 2016 (26) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |