Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) D. Sciulli
ANO 1992
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Symbolic Interaction
ISSN 0195-6086
E-ISSN 1533-8665
EDITORA Wiley-Blackwell
DOI 10.1525/si.1992.15.3.299
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 a0ae3bcee50226561124282c0174a418

Resumo

Habermas' critical theory stands or falls on the unity of procedural reason. When Stephen Toulmin raised the problem of reason being differentiated by functions and purposes within each field of argumentation, whether law, medicine, science, or politics, Habermas' response was both weak and vague. This paper proposes how Habermas may concede Toulmin's point, and yet demonstrate that it does not ultimately challenge the unity of procedural reason that grounds his critical theory.

Ferramentas