Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Facing the Pandemic in Brazil

Controversies Surrounding "Early Treatment" and Vaccination

Bibliographic Data

ID2489305
AuthorsGabriela Blanco (0000-0002-2815-1228, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, corresponding author), Eleandra Raquel Da Silva Koch (0000-0002-6882-5987, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Camila Dellagnese Prates (0000-0003-0317-7074, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul)
Year2022
Volume19
Publication date2022-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueVibrant Virtual Brazilian Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1809-4341 • E-ISSN: 1809-4341
PublisherFapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1590/1809-43412022v19e903
OpenAlexW4285248616
SCIELO_PIDS1809-43412022000100903
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited9

The article investigates the controversies that emerge with the production of the CoronaVac vaccine, the first Covid-19 vaccine available in Brazil, on June 11th, 2020. Based on Actor-Network Theory, this study is inspired by virtual ethnography. We thus privilege digital documents from government agencies and medical entities, specialized publications, publications in Facebook groups, and the writing of a virtual field diary. Our investigation ends with the approval of the CoronaVac and Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccines by the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa). We identify the construction of factoids by groups that were critical of social distancing measures, basing themselves on the use of purportedly scientific arguments. The alliances established between doctors and the federal government through the Ministry of Health challenged the vaccine as a technoscientific artifact, and advocated for drugs that were part of the so-called "early treatment" as the "cure" for the pandemic in Brazil

Agency (philosophy · Artifact (error · Christian ministry · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Government (linguistics · Pandemic · Political science · Privilege (computing · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Global Security and Public Health · Law · Medicine · Psychology

  • Necessidades de Informação sobre Covid-19

    Open Access•Leticia Barbosa, André Pereira Neto et al.•Saúde em Debate•2023

  • ‘Going back home’, going to the ‘ghetto’

    Open Access•L F Rios, Cinthia De Oliveira et al.•Global Public Health•2026

  • The future of Brazilian science

    Open Access•Mercedes M C Bustamante, Jeffrey Hipolito et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2023

  • Retracted

    Open Access•Philippe Gautret, Jean-Christophe Lagier et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • War and peace in an age of ecological conflicts

    Bruno Latour•Revue Juridique de l Environnement•2014

  • The Anatomy of Envy

    George M Foster, R J Apthorpe et al.•Current Anthropology•1972

  • Controvérsias em torno do uso experimental da cloroquina / hidroxicloroquina contra a Covid-19

    Open Access•Marilena Cordeiro Dias Villela Corrêa, Luiz Villarinho Pereira Mendes et al.•Physis Revista de Saúde Coletiva•2020

  • Pós-verdade e a crise do sistema de peritos

    Open Access•L Cesarino•Ilha Revista de Antropologia•2021

  • Anarquismo Ontológico e Verdade no Antropoceno

    Open Access•M Almeida•Ilha Revista de Antropologia•2021

  • A pandemia de Covid-19 na UTI

    Open Access•Everson Fernandes Pereira•Horizontes Antropológicos•2021

  • A Covid-19 e suas múltiplas pandemias

    Open Access•J Segata, Patrice Schuch et al.•Horizontes Antropológicos•2021

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae