Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Some Questions About Community Self-Surveys

When Amateurs Conduct Research

Bibliographic Data

ID2497884
AuthorsEleanor Wolf (Wayne State University, corresponding author)
Year1964
Volume23
Issue1
Pages85-89
Publication date1964-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Organization (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-7259 • E-ISSN: 1938-3517
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.17730/humo.23.1.758875743233x203
OpenAlexW1963665394
LanguageEN

In this article I want to call attention to some of the problems that may arise when citizens are deeply involved in the conduct, that is, in the data-gathering processes of research. To be sure, for years many studies of the type classified as action-research have solicited the help and co-operation of the practitioners who presumably will utilize the research findings. But the responsibility for the direction of the investigation itself is quite clearly in the hands of the social scientist. I am concerned here, by contrast, with those projects where the research itself is conducted by non-professionals, with varying degrees of assistance from social scientists.1 The most commonly encountered example of such projects is the community self-survey. Arnold Rose has described it as follows:This survey fits the traditional pattern of surveys in content, but not in method. It is purely descriptive, and its only innovation is that the research is carried on by participant members of the community rather than by

Criminology · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Survey research · Evaluation and Performance Assessment

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae