Two Patterns of Industrial Administration
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2498045 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William Rushing, William A Rushing (Washington State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1967 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 32-39 |
| Publication date | 1967-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Organization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-7259 • E-ISSN: 1938-3517 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.17730/humo.26.1-2.r4336787781v772v |
| OpenAlex | W2078912001 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
Although everyone agrees that administrative personnel are essential for a bureaucratic organization, the effect of organizational size in determining the proportion of personnel who perform administrative tasks is in doubt. From a variety of organizational settings, positive, negative, and nonexistent relationships between organizational size and relative size of the administrative component have been reported, leaving the question for organizations in general largely unanswered. Nevertheless, when a distinction is made between studies of industrial and non-industrial organizations, on the one hand, and between managerial and clerical personnel within industrial organizations, on the other, certain hypotheses are suggested
Administration (probate law) · Bureaucracy · Business · Organizational Effectiveness · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Variety (cybernetics) · Accounting and Organizational Management · Computer Science · Law
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,09 |
| Citation span | 1972 - 1989 (18) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |