The Political Economy of Agricultural Resettlement and Rural Development in Zimbabwe
The Performance of Family Farms and Producer Cooperatives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2499320 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kofi Akwabi-Ameyaw (California State University, Stanislaus, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1990 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 320-338 |
| Publication date | 1990-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Organization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-7259 • E-ISSN: 1938-3517 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.17730/humo.49.4.85524hh0082r3jw1 |
| OpenAlex | W2073560796 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 12 |
Zimbabwe's rural and agricultural development reflects the development policy contradictions of the African continent. A major aspect of the country's development program involves the large-scale resettlement of poor and landless farm households under various planning models. Currently, the two most important of these models are the Model A individual-family managed farms and the Model B cooperatively organized farms. This article evaluates aspects of the implementation and performance of these so-called Model A and B schemes. Evidence is presented for a comparative case study of two adjacent and contrasting schemes, namely, Mufurudzi Model A and Simba Youth Model B schemes both established in 1980 in the Mashonaland Central Province. Planning projections for these resettlement schemes indicate optimistic economic returns, especially after three to five years of inception. However, while the Model As are generally doing very well the Model Bs are woefully underperforming. For instance, the greater majority of households in Mufurudzi are producing enough grain for subsistence and achieving positive net cash incomes from maize and cotton sales. They are also accumulating household material items and capital assets. Resettlement is there-fore improving the quality of their lifestyles. On the other hand the experiences of the Simba Youths, like the overwhelming majority of their counterparts elsewhere, are of increasing indebtedness, dependency, apparent hopelessness and failure. This lesson has broad implications for policy choices in African agriculture. While cooperatives in general appear attractive for mobilizing communities for grassroots development the abysmal performance of the producer cooperatives in Zimbabwe and all over Africa make them a liability rather than a strategic asset for growth and positive change
Agricultural development · Agricultural economics · Agriculture · Business · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Political science · Politics · Rural development · Rural economy · African studies and sociopolitical issues · Cooperative Studies and Economics · Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
The Evolution of Zimbabwe's Tobacco Industry
My life got Lost’
Producer cooperative resettlement projects in Zimbabwe
Land reform & changing social relations for farm workers in Zimbabwe
Characteristics and performance of resettlement programs
Here it is our land, the two of us”
Land Reform, Growth and Equity
Co-operatives and the poor
A modified collective agriculture in rural growth-with-equity
Traditional Production in Primitive African Economies
"How we should measure "change
Rivalry and Taking Kinsmen for Granted
Co-operative Institutions and Culture Change in South Africa
Preconditions and Limits in the Formation of Associations
The Rise of a Female Professional Elite
Forever Gained
Self-Interest and Corruption in Bukusu Cooperatives
On the Study of Social Change
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,21 |
| Citation span | 1993 - 2022 (30) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |