Developments in the Phenomenological Reading of Durkheim's Work
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2554848 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Herman Coenen (Tilburg University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1981 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 951 |
| Publication date | 1981-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Forces (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-7732 • E-ISSN: 1534-7605 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2577975 |
| OpenAlex | W4243056332 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 5 |
The opposition between phenomenological sociology and Durkheimian sociology is not as absolute as it is often presented. The various ways in which Durkheim's work has been read by phenomenological authors throughout the last fifty years testify to a development toward greater proximity, implying changes in phenomenologists' interpretation of Durkheim as well as in their own starting points. Beginning with an exposition of one of the most antithetical stands towards Durkheim, the article points out different phases of the aforementioned development: (1) A more or less total opposition; (2) A positive view of the challenge that phenomenologists can find in Durkheim's work and an attempt to incorporate it into their own viewpoints without really changing the latter; (3) A simultaneous reinterpretation of Durkheim's sociologism and the phenomenological notions of subjectivity and intentionality, on the common basis of a renewed insight into the corporeal character of human social phenomena
Aesthetics · Epistemology · Exposition (narrative) · Intentionality · Linguistics · Opposition (politics) · Phenomenology (philosophy) · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Reinterpretation · Sociology · Subjectivity · Viewpoints · Critical Realism in Sociology · Emile Durkheim and Sociology · Engineering · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Representations and Identity
| Citations per year | 0.05 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1985 - 2021 (37) |
| Highly cited | No |