Relative Effects of Individual Dependencies
Further Tests of the Relation between Power Imbalance and Power Use
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2555336 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Linda D Molm (Emory University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1985 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 810 |
| Publication date | 1985-03-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Forces (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-7732 • E-ISSN: 1534-7605 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2578493 |
| OpenAlex | W4241238116 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
Power-dependence theory proposes that power use increases with the imbalance of dependencies in a relation. This study tested and supported the prediction that power imbalance is not a unitary variable, and that the dependencies of the weaker and stronger persons in a relation can have very different effects on power use. A laboratory experiment compared orthogonal manipulations of both persons' dependencies across equivalent levels of power imbalance. As predicted, the dependence of the weaker person has a strong and predominantly linear effect on power use, whereas the dependence of the stronger person has a weak and curvilinear effect. The study also tested the prediction that these relations are causally mediated by the reinforcement contingencies that the powerful person establishes to control the other's behavior. These contingencies mediated the effects of the stronger person's dependence, but not the effects of the weaker person's dependence. Implications for power-dependence theory and research are discussed
Data mining · Econometrics · Physics · Power (physics) · Reinforcement · Relation (database) · Thermodynamics · Unitary state · Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Computer Science · Mathematics · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.19 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2000 - 2022 (23) |
| Highly cited | No |