Underwater Archaeology

Its Nature and Limitations

Bibliographic Data

ID2562905
AuthorsJohn M Goggin (University of Florida, corresponding author)
Year1960
Volume25
Issue3
Pages348-354
Publication date1960-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Antiquity (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7316 • E-ISSN: 2325-5064
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/277518
OpenAlexW1983273864
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited3

The recent development of efficient free-diving apparatus has made possible underwater exploration for both sport and science. Human and cultural remains underwater are being extensively exploited. Although the term 'underwater archaeology' is frequently applied to such activities, most are at the best only underwater salvage. Archaeological remains in lakes, springs, rivers, or the sea have considerable to offer. Perhaps their greatest value is the more complete condition of such artifacts in contrast to similar remains on land. However, they often suffer from decomposition, impregnation with minerals, or incrustation by algae or corals. Although context and sequential (or stratigraphic) position are not so easily found or recognized as on land, they are present in many cases. Any body of water is a possible site of study, but in practice, areas of potential importance are limited by location, depth, visibility, and bottom factors. There are four major types of underwater archaeological sites: (1) discarded refuse and 'lost' material; (2) submerged sites of former human occupation; (3) shrines or places of offerings; and (4) shipwrecks

Archaeology · Context (archaeology) · Geography · Underwater · Underwater archaeology · Visibility · Geology · Maritime and Coastal Archaeology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub