Sampling in Archaeological Surveys
A Critique
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2566491 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Plog (0000-0002-5481-2878, corresponding author), Stephen Plog |
| Year | 1978 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 280-285 |
| Publication date | 1978-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Antiquity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7316 • E-ISSN: 2325-5064 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/279252 |
| OpenAlex | W2317194704 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 1 |
Some of the conclusions reached by Mueller (1974) in his study of sampling techniques for archaeological surveys must be disregarded because of the use of inappropriate formulas. In addition, his use of the concept of economy in comparing sampling techniques is questioned, as is his suggestion that the utility of probability sampling in archaeology must be tested
Archaeology · Geography · Population · Probability sampling · Sampling (signal processing) · Sociology · Archaeological Research and Protection · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Archaeology and Natural History · Computer Science · Demography · History
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,1 |
| Citation span | 1978 - 2022 (45) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |