Comments on Sullivan and Rozen's 'Debitage Analysis and Archaeological Interpretation'
Dados Bibliográficos
| AUTOR(ES) | |
|---|---|
| ANO | 1989 |
| TIPO | Artigo |
| PERIÓDICO | American Antiquity |
| ISSN | 0002-7316 |
| E-ISSN | 2325-5064 |
| EDITORA | Cambridge University Press |
| DOI | 10.2307/281339 |
| CITAÇÕES | 10 |
| ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
| MD5 |
a125d0e9b274336c68d73e580026ef81
|
Resumo
Sullivan and Rozen (1985) suggest that inadequate typologies limit the interpretation of chipped-stone debitage. We contend that the methodology of inference rather than typological structure is limiting debitage analyses. Inferences about the meaning of archaeological data must be derived from sources that are independent of the archaeological record.