Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) S.L. Kuhn
ANO 1996
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO American Antiquity
ISSN 0002-7316
E-ISSN 2325-5064
EDITORA Cambridge University Press
DOI 10.2307/281843
CITAÇÕES 8
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 b1fab769ebda89da39ae47401fd48897

Resumo

Toby Morrow argues that I (Kuhn 1994) made an error in calculating the utility/mass ratio of retouched tools, and he proposes an 'alternative' formula. Unfortunately, Morrow confounds utility per se with ratio of utility to weight, and, as a result, his alternative approach is erroneous. This response to Morrow examines the central issue of how artifact utility is assessed. The main message of my original paper is reaffirmed. Utility/mass ratios eventually begin to decline as artifacts get large, and optimal size ranges can be estimated based on a few simplifying assumptions.

Ferramentas