The Trouble with Ham Steaks: A Reply to Morrow
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
ANO | 1996 |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | American Antiquity |
ISSN | 0002-7316 |
E-ISSN | 2325-5064 |
EDITORA | Cambridge University Press |
DOI | 10.2307/281843 |
CITAÇÕES | 8 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
b1fab769ebda89da39ae47401fd48897
|
Resumo
Toby Morrow argues that I (Kuhn 1994) made an error in calculating the utility/mass ratio of retouched tools, and he proposes an 'alternative' formula. Unfortunately, Morrow confounds utility per se with ratio of utility to weight, and, as a result, his alternative approach is erroneous. This response to Morrow examines the central issue of how artifact utility is assessed. The main message of my original paper is reaffirmed. Utility/mass ratios eventually begin to decline as artifacts get large, and optimal size ranges can be estimated based on a few simplifying assumptions.