An Approach for Assessing Marital Decision-Making Processes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2587960 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wayne Hill (corresponding author), John Scanzoni |
| Year | 1982 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 927 |
| Publication date | 1982-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Marriage and the Family (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-2445 • E-ISSN: 1741-3737 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/351455 |
| OpenAlex | W2313795003 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
| References cited | 12 |
Recent years have witnessed the emergence of a vast literature evaluating the research and theory pertaining to family decision making. Since we cannot survey that literature here, we merely cite prior exhaustive reviews (Cromwell and Olson, 1975; McDonald, 1980) and proceed directly to one of the issues that surfaces repeatedly throughout that literature, namely, the conceptualization and measurement of decisionmaking processes. Although there was a wide disparity of opinion over many matters expressed throughout the Cromwell and Olson anthology, there was a virtual unanimity regarding the point that the field can no longer be content with the Blood and Wolfe (1960) outcome-focused technique to assess marital decision making. Strongly held was the conclusion that it is desirable and indeed necessary, for both theoretical and substantive reasons, to try to come to grips with the measurement of processes. While the several contributors to that anthology concurred that it is a horrendously complex empirical matter, the measurement of processes is an essential next step if we are to begin to go beyond our present levels of understanding of decision making in particular, and family dynamics in general. In his foreword to that anthology, Hill (1975:xi) argued that this 'benchmark' book. . . can save scholars much grief if they ... carry research and theory-building forward rather than repeatedly making the same mistake-one of those mistakes being over-reliance on the final-say technique. Nevertheless, in spite of Hill's urgings, the final-say technique has not disappeared from the recent literature (Straus et al., 1980; Quarm, 1981; Allen, 1981); it maintains its continued vitality and appeal owing chiefly to the ease with which it can be administered
Conceptualization · Economics · Empirical research · Epistemology · Mistake · Political science · Positive economics · Sociology · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Computer Science · Conflict Management and Negotiation · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Law · Philosophy · Psychology
Women's Employment and Family Relations
Effects of gender role disparity on couples' decision-making processes
Relative Fairness and the Division of Housework
Couple Consensus during Marital Joint Decision-Making
A Model for the Analysis of Paired Data
Initiation and response
Divorced mothers' gender role ideology, locus of control, and disciplinary patterns
Negotiation Effectiveness and Acceptable Outcomes
The Powers of Intimate Companions
Journeys to remain childless
The Myth of Mutuality
Retirement Satisfaction for Retirees and their Spouses
Couple Decision Making
Development of a Quantitative Measure of a Family from Self-Reports of Family Members
Gendered Equity? Comparing Explanations of Women's Satisfaction with the Domestic Division of Labour
Disputes and negotiations
Social behavior
Behind Closed Doors
Exchange and Power in Social Life
A Stochastic Model of Relational Control in Dyadic Interaction
A Conceptual Approach to Explicit Marital Negotiation
Family Power
Random Measurement Error as a Source of Discrepancies between the Reports of Wives and Husbands concerning Marital Power and Task Allocation
Temporal Form
The Dyad as the Unit of Analysis
Family Sociology or Wives' Family Sociology? A Cross-Cultural Examination of Decision-Making
| Unique citing works | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,36 |
| Citation span | 1984 - 2024 (41) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 14 |