Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An Approach for Assessing Marital Decision-Making Processes

Bibliographic Data

ID2587960
AuthorsWayne Hill (corresponding author), John Scanzoni
Year1982
Volume44
Issue4
Pages927
Publication date1982-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Marriage and the Family (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-2445 • E-ISSN: 1741-3737
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/351455
OpenAlexW2313795003
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited12

Recent years have witnessed the emergence of a vast literature evaluating the research and theory pertaining to family decision making. Since we cannot survey that literature here, we merely cite prior exhaustive reviews (Cromwell and Olson, 1975; McDonald, 1980) and proceed directly to one of the issues that surfaces repeatedly throughout that literature, namely, the conceptualization and measurement of decisionmaking processes. Although there was a wide disparity of opinion over many matters expressed throughout the Cromwell and Olson anthology, there was a virtual unanimity regarding the point that the field can no longer be content with the Blood and Wolfe (1960) outcome-focused technique to assess marital decision making. Strongly held was the conclusion that it is desirable and indeed necessary, for both theoretical and substantive reasons, to try to come to grips with the measurement of processes. While the several contributors to that anthology concurred that it is a horrendously complex empirical matter, the measurement of processes is an essential next step if we are to begin to go beyond our present levels of understanding of decision making in particular, and family dynamics in general. In his foreword to that anthology, Hill (1975:xi) argued that this 'benchmark' book. . . can save scholars much grief if they ... carry research and theory-building forward rather than repeatedly making the same mistake-one of those mistakes being over-reliance on the final-say technique. Nevertheless, in spite of Hill's urgings, the final-say technique has not disappeared from the recent literature (Straus et al., 1980; Quarm, 1981; Allen, 1981); it maintains its continued vitality and appeal owing chiefly to the ease with which it can be administered

Conceptualization · Economics · Empirical research · Epistemology · Mistake · Political science · Positive economics · Sociology · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Computer Science · Conflict Management and Negotiation · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Law · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Women's Employment and Family Relations

    Glenna Spitze•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1988

  • Effects of gender role disparity on couples' decision-making processes

    Cynthia J Voelz•Journal of Personality and Social…•1985

  • Relative Fairness and the Division of Housework

    Mary Clare Lennon, Sarah Rosenfield•American Journal of Sociology•1994

  • Couple Consensus during Marital Joint Decision-Making

    Deborah D Godwin, John Scanzoni•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1989

  • A Model for the Analysis of Paired Data

    Jay D Teachman, Karen Carver et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1995

  • Initiation and response

    Open Access•Elizabeth Grauerholz, Richard T Serpe•Sex Roles•1985

  • Divorced mothers' gender role ideology, locus of control, and disciplinary patterns

    Open Access•Phyllis A Heath, Kathleen Cavanaugh•Sex Roles•1993

  • Negotiation Effectiveness and Acceptable Outcomes

    John Scanzoni, Deborah D Godwin•Social Psychology Quarterly•1990

  • The Powers of Intimate Companions

    Anqi Xu, Xu Anqi•Chinese Sociology & Anthropology•2011

  • Journeys to remain childless

    Open Access•Kyung-Hee Lee, Kyunghee Lee et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2014

  • The Myth of Mutuality

    Open Access•Jaclyn S Wong, Allison Daminger•Gender & Society•2024

  • Retirement Satisfaction for Retirees and their Spouses

    Open Access•Donald B Smith, Deborah B Smith et al.•Journal of Family Issues•2004

  • Couple Decision Making

    Open Access•Deborah D Godwin, John Scanzoni•Journal of Family Issues•1989

  • Development of a Quantitative Measure of a Family from Self-Reports of Family Members

    Open Access•Lynda Henley Walters, Joe F Pittman et al.•Journal of Family Issues•1984

  • Gendered Equity? Comparing Explanations of Women's Satisfaction with the Domestic Division of Labour

    Open Access•Richard Layte•Work Employment and Society•1998

  • Disputes and negotiations

    P H Gulliver•Disputes and negotiations•1979

  • Social behavior

    George Caspar Homans•Social behavior•1974

  • Behind Closed Doors

    M A Straus, Richard J Gelles et al.•Behind Closed Doors•2017

  • Exchange and Power in Social Life

    Peter M Blau•Exchange And Power In Social Life•2017

  • A Stochastic Model of Relational Control in Dyadic Interaction

    Ronald W Manderscheid, Donald S Rae et al.•American Sociological Review•1982

  • A Conceptual Approach to Explicit Marital Negotiation

    John Scanzoni, Karen A Polonko et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1980

  • Family Power

    Gerald W Mcdonald•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1980

  • Random Measurement Error as a Source of Discrepancies between the Reports of Wives and Husbands concerning Marital Power and Task Allocation

    Daisy Quarm•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1981

  • Temporal Form

    John M Gottman•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1982

  • The Dyad as the Unit of Analysis

    Linda Thompson, Alexis J Walker•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1982

  • Family Sociology or Wives' Family Sociology? A Cross-Cultural Examination of Decision-Making

    Constantina Safilios-Rothschild, Constantina Safilios‐rothschild•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1969

Unique citing works15
Citations per year0,36
Citation span1984 - 2024 (41)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae