Women's Marital Naming in Two Generations
A National Study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2590215 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Read Johnson (0000-0002-4691-2019, corresponding author), Laurie K Scheuble |
| Year | 1995 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 724 |
| Publication date | 1995-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Marriage and the Family (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-2445 • E-ISSN: 1741-3737 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/353926 |
| OpenAlex | W1965712678 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 49 |
| References cited | 10 |
Social explanations for patterns and trends in marital naming have received only sporadic attention from both social scientists and mass media, although researchers have recognized need to further study issue (Duggan, Cota, & Dion, 1993). In United States, normative expectation is that women will take their husband's last when they marry, How much this tradition has changed over time is uncertain, given that there has been little research that has empirically examined extent to which marital naming patterns depart from this traditional norm. One recent study found that 10% of married women in U.S. use something other than their husband's last name (Brightman, 1994, p. 9). Five percent of women in study hyphenated their last with that of their spouse, 2% used their maiden exclusively, and 3% used some other alternative, such as their birth surname as a middle name. Women most likely to use a nonconventional last had higher levels of education, were younger, and were either in low-income or high-income category (Brightman, 1994). Although these findings give some indication of frequency of nonconventional naming choices in U.S., study failed to empirically examine, in any detail, what factors account for nontraditional marital naming choices. The extent to which naming patterns depart from traditional pattern can have important social .consequences. Language, and meanings and symbols attached to it, tell us a lot about social relationships (McDowell & Pringle, 1992). The practice of a married woman her husband's name arises from a time when patriarchal nature of marriage was dominant in American society. This practice symbolically reinforced view that woman's identity was subsumed under her status as a wife (Weitzman, 1981). If United States is moving away from this pattern of naming, then of her issues are raised, such as how a family is labeled and identified by others (e.g., as the Jones), which last is given to offspring, and extent to which use of different last names by two spouses affects identification with marriage. Further examination of these issues first requires some empirical evidence about extent to which such practices are changing and about factors that influence marital choices. Our research study focuses on national prevalence of naming practices in two generations, social determinants of naming choices, and intergenerational transmission of marital naming practices. Little empirical information is available about any of these issues. Premarital preferences indicated by college students suggest that in about 9 out of 10 marriages, women plan to take last of their husband (Scheuble & Johnson, 1993). Little is known about prevalence of woman taking last of her spouse but keeping her birth surname as her middle name. Although personal observations suggest that this is a relatively common choice, Brightman's (1994) findings from a national sample suggest that only 3% choose this practice. What factors predict whether or not a woman will make a nonconventional marital choice? We examine following characteristics of married persons that may affect choice: age, age at first marriage, education, premarital cohabitation, age when dating began, religiosity, income, gender role traditionalism, wife's career orientation, parents' naming practices, community size and region. We expect that younger women will be more likely than older women to select a nonconventional last upon marriage, given that older women are more likely to have married during a time when traditional role expectations were more pervasive. Younger women are more likely to have experienced changing marital role expectations that have been brought about by increased educational levels, lower fertility, higher divorce rates, and changes in gender role attitudes
Developmental psychology · Marital status · Norm (philosophy · Normative · Political science · Population · Sociology · Spouse · Demography · Gender Studies in Language · Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research · Psychology · Social Psychology
Perceptions of Married Women and Married Men with Hyphenated Surnames
Decyzje kobiet o nazwisku po ślubie w wymiarze diachronicznym i synchronicznym
When Mr. Right Becomes Mr. Wrong
Canadian Brides’-to-Be Surname Choice
Is Marriage Individualized? What Couples Actually Do
Choosing’ the Patriarchal Norm
Ambivalent Sexism Impacts Attitudes Toward Marital Surname Change Decisions
Do Lesbians Change Their Last Names in the Context of a Committed Relationship
Who would take whose name?’ Accounts of naming practices in same‐sex relationships
What should we call our kids? Choosing children’s surnames when parents’ last names differ
What’s in a name? An experimental test of marital name change on perceptions of female political candidates
The politics of marital name change
Differences in Beliefs and Behaviors Between Feminist Actual and Anticipated Mothers
Names Can Never Hurt Me?”
Names and “Doing Gender”
What’s In a Name? Marital Name Choice Revisited
She Might be Afraid of Commitment”
Marital Name Changing Attitudes and Plans of College Students
Does a Woman’s Marital Surname Choice Influence Perceptions of Her Husband? An Analysis Focusing on Gender-Typed Traits and Relationship Power Dynamics
Tampering with Tradition
Married Women’s Situational Use of Last Names
Doing gender and the surname choices of married women
Women’s Marital Surname Change by Bride’s Age and Jurisdiction of Residence
Keeping Her Surname as a Middle Name at Marriage
The Overlooked and Understudied Onomastic Hyphen
Women's Post-Marital Name Retention and the Communication of Identity
Attitudes Toward Women's Marital Name Choices
Social and Cognitive Factors in Women's Marital Name Choice
North American Women's Surname Choice Based on Ethnicity and Self-Identification as Feminists
Hawaii Data
Taking Thy Husband's Name
The Influence of Choice Feminism on Women’s and Men’s Attitudes towards Name Changing at Marriage
Trends in Women's Marital Name Choices
Attitudes Toward Married Women's Surnames
Are gender norm violations always perceived negatively? The effects of marital name choice on perceived work and relationship commitments
Still the Father's Name? Normative Change and Continuity in Children's Surnames
The Social Desirability of Rallying ’Round the Flag
"I Would Like Us to Share a Name so That We Can Be Recognized in Society." Marital Surname Preferences in Same-Sex Relationships
Marital Naming Plans among Students at Four Evangelical Colleges
Emerging adults' preferred surnames
Understanding Tradition
Marital Name Change as a Window into Gender Attitudes
Children's Surnames, Moral Dilemmas
Flipping the (Surname) Script
Women's Marital Naming Choices in a Nationally Representative Sample
Surnaming Children Born to Lesbian and Heterosexual Couples
Neo-traditional Child Surnaming in Contemporary China
Individualized Marriage and the Integration of Resources
Women's Choice of Surname Upon Marriage in Norway
Handbook of Marriage and the Family
Family Values, Religiosity, and Gender
A House of My Own
Taking Thy Husband's Name
Causes and Consequences of Sex-Role Attitudes and Attitude Change
Parental Gender Role Nontraditionalism and Offspring Outcomes
Marital Name Change
The Long-Term Effects of Family Structure on Gender-Role Attitudes
Family-Building Patterns of Professional Women
Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Success
| Unique citing works | 49 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,69 |
| Citation span | 1997 - 2026 (30) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 49 |