Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What Are OECD Trade Preferences Worth to Sub-Saharan Africa

Bibliographic Data

ID2596034
AuthorsAlexander J Yeats (0000-0002-7272-8418, corresponding author)
Year1995
Volume38
Issue1
Pages81
Publication date1995-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAfrican Studies Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-0206 • E-ISSN: 1555-2462
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/525475
OpenAlexW1539514655
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited4

A problem which has complicated multilateral trade negotiations like GATT's Uruguay Round is that OECD countries have adopted important departures from the most-favored-nation (MFN) principle in their trade regimes. Recently these departures have taken the form of regional trade preferences, such as the Canada-United States Free Trade Arrangement, NAFTA, the Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Arrangement or European Community and EFTA preferences for Eastern Europe. Developing countries receive important trade preferences under the OECD countries' Generalized System of Preference (GSP) schemes, and through preferences extended under the EEC Lome Convention and the US Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI). Since the Uruguay Round will lower trade barriers on an MFN basis it poses a dilemma for preference-receiving countries. Specifically, MFN tariff reductions will erode these countries' margins of preference and cause their competitive position to deteriorate vis-a-vis other suppliers. Trade losses will occur as some preference-receiving goods are displaced (diverted) by exports from other (non-preference receiving) countries. As a result, preference-receiving countries could justifiably try to minimize reductions in MFN tariffs. Overall, the strategy which these countries might adopt vis-a-vis the multilateral trade negotiations could be determined by an assessment of whether the likely trade gains from lower MFN tariffs on their non-preference receiving goods would offset the expected losses from their preference-receiving exports. This study examines the problem of preference erosion from the perspective of Sub-Saharan African countries. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) was selected for analysis due to the extensive multiple tariff preferences these countries receive in OECD markets (i.e., GSP, Lome Convention and, in many cases, least developed country preferences), and the fact that the region's export growth has been below that of most other countries (World Bank 1992

Bilateral trade · China · Developing country · Economic growth · Economics · Free trade · Geography · International economics · International free trade agreement · International trade · Market access · Multilateral trade negotiations · Negotiation · Political science · Preference · Tariff · Global Trade and Competitiveness · Global trade and economics · World Trade Organization Law

  • Knowledge Hierarchies and Feminist Dilemmas

    Open Access•B Purkayastha•Producing Inclusive Feminist…•2021

  • Potential erosion of trade preferences in agricultural products

    Open Access•Fumiko Yamazaki•Food Policy•1996

  • Ghana’s non-traditional export sector

    Open Access•Edward Addo, Robert L Marshall et al.•Geoforum•2000

  • Wipe the Blackboard Clean

    Open Access•Henk J Van Rinsum•African Studies Review•2002

  • India and the Tokyo round

    Open Access•Andre Sapir, Robert E Baldwin et al.•World Development•1983

  • MFN Tariff Reductions and Developing Country Trade Benefits Under the GSP

    Richard Baldwin, R E Baldwin et al.•The Economic Journal•1977

  • Tokyo Rounds of Trade Negotiations and the Generalised System of Preferences

    Jaleel Ahmad•The Economic Journal•1978

  • Trade and Development in Sub-Saharan Africa

    Carl C Mabbs-Zeno, Carl C Mabbs‐zeno et al.•African Studies Review•1992

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,13
Citation span1996 - 2021 (26)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae