Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Labor and Work in the Ethics of Contemporary Orthodoxy

Restoring a Peasant House, Monastery and Holy Russia

Bibliographic Data

ID2617557
AuthorsPolina R Yarovaya (0009-0002-0828-7854, Higher School of Economics – Saint Petersburg Branch, corresponding author)
Year2024
Issue6
Pages81-96
Publication date2024-12-15
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEtnograficheskoe obozrenie (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0869-5415 • E-ISSN: 0869-5415
PublisherThe Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.31857/s0869541524060057
OpenAlexW4406177719
LanguageEN
References cited12

Drawing on the case of the repair of a peasant house by residents of a dilapidated (and also being restored) Orthodox monastery in the Russian North, the article raises the question of the relationship between theology and economics of economic ethics. The ethnographic analysis of this article focuses on the categories of "labor" and "work" in the practice of restoration and on the example of the hegumen of the monastery and his wards. My argument is that the spiritualization of "labor" and the theological understanding of the "laborer" in the context of the restoration of the Church is opposed to the economic (secular) strategies of "work" and "worker". The hegumen inscribes the reconstruction of the destroyed peasant house into the general concept of the restoration of the church, which is carried out in the conditions of modernity and its challenges. The restoration of the Church seems to the hegumen and his wards not so much a "work" to repair cultural monuments, but a "labor" to return to the pre-revolutionary way of life, which is the prototype of a utopian paradise, Holy Russia. "Labor" and "work" are different by their temporalities: work is aimed at the result in the future while labor as spiritual practice is grounding for the return to the past. The article examines how the methodology of the ideal types of connection between Protestant ethics and capitalism (Weber) can be applied in the context of Orthodox economic ethics (Zabaev) through Weber's "understanding" methodology. The purpose of the article is to point out the inconsistency of binary oppositions used to interpret labor and work practices in an Orthodox monastery, and the need to consider them in the context of the historical continuity of practices and their meanings

Archaeology · Economic history · Orthodoxy · Peasant · Political science · Sociology · Work (physics · Engineering · History · Law · Religion and Society Interactions

  • Ideology and Utopia

    Karl Mannheim•Ideology and Utopia•2013

  • Humility and Economic Ethics of the Russian Orthodox Church

    Open Access•Ivan Zabaev•State Religion and Church in…•2018

  • Bodies of Lenin

    Alexei Yurchak•Representations•2015

  • The Bovine Mystique

    James Ferguson•Man•1985

  • The canon and the mushroom

    Open Access•Alexei Yurchak•Hau Journal of Ethnographic Theory•2017

  • Retrotopia

    Open Access•István Rév•Current Sociology•1998

  • Social Theory and Everyday Marxists

    Open Access•Anna Kruglova•Comparative Studies in Society…•2017

  • Secrecy and the Sense of an Ending

    Open Access•Joel Robbins•Comparative Studies in Society…•2001

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae