Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Parliament Membership during the Single-Party System in Turkey (1925-1945)

Bibliographic Data

ID2631339
AuthorsCemil Koçak (Sabancı Üniversitesi, corresponding author)
Year2005
Volume3
Issue3
Publication date2005-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean journal of Turkish studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1773-0546 • E-ISSN: 1773-0546
PublisherOpenEdition (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.4000/ejts.497
OpenAlexW1527022679
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited10

The official legitimization of the single-party regime in Turkey lay with Parliament, which, as a representative of the people, controlled the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. However, the parliamentary period after 1925 was highlighted by a lack of freedom of speech, with scope for political discussion limited. This paper aims to establish the role of MPs during this period. At the head of the single-party system, the President was free to choose every party member for Parliament. This meant competition was very restricted, be it in the form of short-lived opposition parties or independent candidates. During the selection process, some social classes, for example high-ranking officer and bureaucrats were privileged. These two groups were the most common in Parliament. On the other hand, local ties were sometimes respected by the regime: rural notables with close relations with party headquarters were easily elected, and remained in Parliament. A MPs’ chance of re-election was significant if he performed his duty with loyalty to the party. The author underlines a stabilization of political personnel throughout this period

Legislature · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Historical Turkish Studies · Law · Ottoman Empire History and Society · Public Administration · Turkey's Politics and Society

  • Representation of the Eastern and Southeastern Provinces in the Turkish Parliament during the National Struggle and Single-Party Era (1920–1946)

    Open Access•Ahmet Demirel•New Perspectives on Turkey•2011

  • Religious Politics in Turkey

    Open Access•Ceren Lord•Religious Politics in Turkey•2018

  • Féminisme d’État, législation et mouvements sociaux en Turquie et en Grèce

    Open Access•Katerina Seraidari•Cahiers balkaniques•2016

  • Agrarian Change, Industrialization and Geopolitics

    Open Access•E Duzgun•European Journal of Sociology•2017

  • The Making of Modern Turkey

    Ahmad Feroz•Making of Modern Turkey•2002

  • History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey

    Open Access•Stanford J Shaw, Ezel Kural Shaw•History of the Ottoman Empire and…•1977

  • The Turkish Political Elite

    Frederick W Frey•The Turkish Political Elite•1965

  • The autonomy of the political field. The resources of the Deputies of Diyarbakır (Turkey)

    Open Access•Gilles Dorronsoro•European journal of Turkish studies•2005

  • The Development of Secularism in Turkey

    Niyazi Berkes•Development of Secularism in Turkey•2013

  • The Development of Secularism in Turkey

    Niyazi Berkes•The Development of Secularism in…•1964

  • The Emergence of Modern Turkey

    G L Lewis•International Affairs•1962

  • Taking up the gauntlet

    Open Access•Çimen Günay-Erkol, Çimen Günay•European journal of Turkish studies•2005

Citations per year0.27
Citation span2011 - 2018 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae