Parliament Membership during the Single-Party System in Turkey (1925-1945)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2631339 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cemil Koçak (Sabancı Üniversitesi, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2005-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European journal of Turkish studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1773-0546 • E-ISSN: 1773-0546 |
| Publisher | OpenEdition (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4000/ejts.497 |
| OpenAlex | W1527022679 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 10 |
The official legitimization of the single-party regime in Turkey lay with Parliament, which, as a representative of the people, controlled the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. However, the parliamentary period after 1925 was highlighted by a lack of freedom of speech, with scope for political discussion limited. This paper aims to establish the role of MPs during this period. At the head of the single-party system, the President was free to choose every party member for Parliament. This meant competition was very restricted, be it in the form of short-lived opposition parties or independent candidates. During the selection process, some social classes, for example high-ranking officer and bureaucrats were privileged. These two groups were the most common in Parliament. On the other hand, local ties were sometimes respected by the regime: rural notables with close relations with party headquarters were easily elected, and remained in Parliament. A MPs’ chance of re-election was significant if he performed his duty with loyalty to the party. The author underlines a stabilization of political personnel throughout this period
Legislature · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Historical Turkish Studies · Law · Ottoman Empire History and Society · Public Administration · Turkey's Politics and Society
The Making of Modern Turkey
History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey
The Turkish Political Elite
The autonomy of the political field. The resources of the Deputies of Diyarbakır (Turkey)
The Development of Secularism in Turkey
The Development of Secularism in Turkey
The Emergence of Modern Turkey
Taking up the gauntlet
| Citations per year | 0.27 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2011 - 2018 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |