The Promised Territories
The Production of Branded Housing Projects in Contemporary Turkey
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2631378 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bilge Serin (0000-0002-3005-0549, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 23 |
| Publication date | 2016-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European journal of Turkish studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1773-0546 • E-ISSN: 1773-0546 |
| Publisher | OpenEdition (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4000/ejts.5383 |
| OpenAlex | W2587737708 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 27 |
Cities in Turkey, following the neoliberal restructuring of the country, have undergone a process of transformation in the last decade at a greater pace than experienced in previous periods. Through these processes, while new territories have been constructed, previous formations have been dismantled. While some of these constructed territories are abstract (e.g. Nomenclature of Units for Territorial Statistics [NUTS] regions), some are tangible and physically defined such as branded housing enclaves.Branded housing projects produce territories in the form of housing enclaves, which provide key services and facilities within their confines exclusively for project residents. By 2013, the number of branded housing projects located in Istanbul alone numbered 852 with the number of units provided by these projects amounting to 7.7% of the total housing stock the city (Sarıçayır 01/21/2014). This paper argues that these territories are co-produced by political society and civil society (in Gramscian terms): while political society regulates and directly contributes to the production of these territories through public actors involved in the branded housing projects, civil society contributes through the production of social consent for such developments. The article discusses the role of political society and civil society in the production of branded housing projects by focusing on the case of Emlak Konut GYO (Real Estate Partnership) projects developed in Istanbul between 2003 and 2014. Firstly, the role of political society is discussed through the roles of TOKI (Housing Development Administration of Turkey) and Emlak Konut GYO as major public actors in the development of these territories; and secondly, the role of civil society is discussed through excavating the traces of production of social consent for branded housing projects in news articles published on Emlak Konut GYO projects between 2003 and 2014. The paper concludes that branded housing projects are emerging as spatial territories in contemporary Turkey as a result of hegemonic struggle through political society and civil society
Civil society · Economic growth · Economics · Economy · Estate · General partnership · Geography · Negotiation · Pace · Political science · Politics · Public housing · Real estate · Restructuring · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Public Administration · Urban and Rural Development Challenges · Urban Planning and Governance
A Political Theory of Territory
Territory
Political Geography
How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis
The Society of the Spectacle
From Polarization to Fragmentation. Recent Changes in Latin American Urbanization
The Political Economy of Communication
What CDA Is About – A Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and Its Developments1
Critical Discourse Analysis As A Method in Social Scientific Research
New Capitalism in Turkey
Antonio Gramsci
Understanding Henri Lefebvre
The Gramscian Moment
Neoliberalism is Dead … Long Live Neoliberalism
Public intervention, private aspiration
The negative effects of construction boom on urban planning and environment in Turkey
Cities and the Geographies of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism”
Reconfiguring Private and Public
Producing Elite Localities
Urban Transformation’ as State-led Property Transfer
Brief History of Neoliberalism
Emerging Spaces of Neoliberalism
Neoliberal Urbanism
Debate on Neoliberalism in and after the Neoliberal Crisis
Neoliberal Urbanism Redux
Urbanization, Everyday Life and the Survival of Capitalism
| Citations per year | 0.43 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |