Critical Indigenous Studies: From Difference to Density
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
ANO | Não informado |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | Cultural Studies Review |
ISSN | 1446-8123 |
E-ISSN | 1837-8692 |
EDITORA | Publisher 15337 |
DOI | 10.5130/csr.v15i2.2039 |
CITAÇÕES | 3 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
fd199b4a64a89c4b51e604f490abe69d
|
Resumo
Proponents of the discipline of Native Studies (in its various guises) have attempted to produce a methodologically and theoretically distinctive body of scholarship to justify its existence in the field of academia. Critiquing Duane Champagne's recent article published in a flagship journal for North American Native Studies, I argue that while establishing Native Studies as a discipline has little or nothing to do with securing Native Studies departments on university campuses, a place nonetheless exists for these departments. Marrying Native Studies literature on the importance of producing tribally specific knowledge with Australian-based Whiteness Studies literature focusing on the utility of indigeneity for denaturalising white privilege, I argue that the discipline of Native Studies should justify itself departmentally by teaching about the complex forms of local indigeneity upon which white privilege is reproduced.