Mixed Communities Require Mixed Theories: Using Mills to Broaden Goffman's Exploration of Identity within the GBLT Communities
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | University of Victoria Libraries |
ANO | 2008 |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | Sociological Research Online |
ISSN | 1360-7804 |
E-ISSN | 1360-7804 |
EDITORA | Sage Publications Ltd |
DOI | 10.5153/sro.1683 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
50a4d19a250da96da5fe2c1a12c69be8
|
Resumo
The central objective of this paper is to attempt to counter an overly-rigid theoretical approach in data analysis. Implicit in the push to identify and follow one proper theoretical stream is the idea that one's particular theoretical approach will always be plausible and contains an inherent 'value' over any other approach. That being said, the purpose of this paper is two-fold. The first is to argue that a rigid theoretical approach to understanding people from non-homogenized communities leaves the analysis wanting. Instead, I refer to a more flexible nature of using a mixed-method approach to analysis, which will generate an appropriately pluralistic representation of someone from a pluralist community. Secondly, this paper suggests that a mixed-method approach should include both a micro and a macro analysis. In this vein, I put forward the benefits of combining the theoretical approaches of both Goffman and Mills. In doing so, I am not suggesting that Goffman and Mills are the only theorists to use. Rather, the combination of these two theories is useful for understanding an intersubjective approach to myself. A flexible epistemological approach would recognize that other situations might call for the use of other theorists.