A Tale of Two Shitties
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2651998 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William J Robertson (0000-0002-5263-5038, University of Arizona, corresponding author), William Robertson (0000-0002-1949-1634) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 20-41 |
| Publication date | 2020-12-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Extreme Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2535-3241 • E-ISSN: 2535-3241 |
| Publisher | University of Oslo Library (PUBLISHER • NO) |
| DOI | 10.5617/jea.8110 |
| OpenAlex | W3117707908 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 24 |
Based on 12 months of ethnographic data collection in an anal cancer prevention clinic, this article uses the extreme examples of patients involuntarily defecating through the anoscope during the procedure to highlight the relationship between the extreme and the everyday. Despite the rarity of this occurrence, I argue that these extreme examples shed light on the ways the daily clinical routines are embodied as an expert habitus. High Resolution Anoscopy procedures are specialized, highly routinized practices that are performed hundreds of times per month at the clinic. These routines result in the development of a clinical habitus that guides physicians in deploying techniques to efficiently conduct the invasive examination. Exemplary examples of ordinary procedures certainly help explain how this expert habitus is enacted through routine clinical practices; however, this expertise becomes especially observable in moments when habituated practices are disrupted, forcing clinicians to react and respond in unscripted ways. I discuss the only two instances of patients defecating through the anoscope that occurred while conducting my research, each with a different clinician. These extreme examples provide rich opportunities to analyze how clinicians with similar procedural habits navigate extraordinary situations in expert and professional but idiosyncratic ways. Whereas exemplary examples of everyday routinized procedures can show the process of developing an expert clinical habitus, these extreme examples more clearly demonstrate how this habitus enacts expertise and professionalism by highlighting the clinicians' abilities to deftly navigate the technical and sociocultural aspects of such extraordinary disruptions
Embodied cognition · Epistemology · Ethnography · Habitus · Participant observation · Social science · Sociology · Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes · Anthropology · Empathy and Medical Education · Medicine · Medicine and Dermatology Studies History · Psychology
American Medicine
Defining and Assessing Professional Competence
Profession of medicine
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
The Birth of the Clinic
Medicine, Rationality and Experience
Outline of a Theory of Practice
The Logic of Practice
Clinical Subjectivation
Orienting to Medicine
Medicine, rationality, and experience
Abjection interrogated
The corporeality of expertise
Interaction Ritual Chains
Habit and Habitus
The Social Transformation of American Medicine
In Shit We Stand United
Enactments of Expertise
Establishing specialty jurisdictions in medicine
Introduction
For a Sociology of Expertise
Techniques of the body∗
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |