Digging One's Own Grave

Bibliographic Data

ID2658656
AuthorsArvo Krikmann (corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume35
Pages53-60
Publication date2007-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFolklore Electronic Journal of Folklore (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1406-0957 • E-ISSN: 1406-0949
PublisherEstonian Literary Museum of Scholarly Press (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.7592/fejf2007.35.krikmann
OpenAlexW2144869768
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited6

The paper aims to demonstrate that some points in the explication of the figurative expression digging one's own grave via the concept of blending given by Gilles Fauconnier and Mark Turner are problematic: (1) Not understanding the consequences of one's deeds is an almost universal presupposition of and impulse or motivation for actualizing any utterance with a forewarning or gloating content (e.g., proverbs), not the singularity characterizing just the expression of grave-digging as such. (2) The inversion of causal and temporal structure is not the case because of metonymic association between the concepts of the grave and death, as a result of which specific causal and temporal order loses any significance. Many synonymous examples can be given in which the image refers to events before the death, between the death and funeral, as well as those after burial. (3) The source domain needs not to be restricted to natural death and modern civilized funerals but should include also the cases of violent deaths, e.g., the scenario of execution and the scenario of hunting and trapping. Preliminarily, a very brief synopsis of the main phases of development of cognitive linguistic theory of metaphor and some favourite examples of blends, used also in previous works, is provided

Ancient history · Archaeology · Art · Digging · Categorization, perception, and language · History · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · linguistics and terminology studies

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access