Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Classical Ancestry of the United States Constitution

Bibliographic Data

ID2730302
AuthorsRichard M Gummere (corresponding author)
Year1962
Volume14
Issue1
Pages3
Publication date1962-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0678 • E-ISSN: 1080-6490
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2710223
OpenAlexW2329420686
LanguageEN
Citations received6

practice went hand in hand with theory, and ideas were regarded as more important than techniques, was its political activity. In no field were Greek and Roman sources more often invoked; and at no time were they more frequently cited than during the preliminary discussions, the debates on the Constitution, the ratifying conventions, the Federalist papers and such publications as John Dickinson's Fabius Letters. The framers of the Constitution did not merely echo or imitate this ancient material: they applied it to the task in hand and transmuted it into workable form. In many cases, given themes from antiquity supplied arguments for both sides of a debate. It is solely with this Great Document in its relation to the classics that we are here concerned. There is no attempt to settle certain problems of Colonial history, or to put the Greco-Roman ideas in competition with modern political scientists, with whom they were of course familiar. Perhaps a remark of Alfred North Whitehead may throw some light:' I know of only two occasions when the people in power did what needed to be done about as well as you can imagine its being possible. One was the framing of your American Constitution. They were able statesmen: they had access to a body of good ideas: they incorporated these principles into the instrument without trying to particularize too explicitly how they should be put into effect; and they were men of immense practical experience themselves.2 The other was in Rome, when Augustus called in the 'new men' of new ideas. These delegates of 1787 were praised by Pitt, by Otto the French attache, by Chastellux and by Lord Camden. Jefferson, perhaps with his

Constitution · Genealogy · Political science · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Political Theory and Influence

  • Philopoemen of Megalopolis

    Open Access•Emmanouil M L Economou•The Achaean Federation in Ancient…•2020

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Emmanouil M L Economou•The Achaean Federation in Ancient…•2020

  • The Political Institutions of the Achaean Sympolity

    Open Access•Emmanouil M L Economou•The Achaean Federation in Ancient…•2020

  • American bicameralism and the legacy of the Roman Senate

    Nicholas Cole•Classical Receptions Journal•2014

  • The emergence and the development of the Achaean federation

    Open Access•Emmanouil M L Economou, Nicholas C Kyriazis et al.•Evolutionary and Institutional…•2016

  • Histoire du mot «démocratie» au Canada et au Québec. Analyse politique des stratégies rhétoriques

    Open Access•Francis Dupuis-Déri, Francis Dupuis‐déri•Canadian Journal of Political…•2009

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,35
Citation span2009 - 2020 (12)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae