Antimasonry and Masonry
The Genesis of Protest, 1826-1827
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2730571 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ronald P Formisano, Kathleen Smith Kutolowski |
| Year | 1977 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 139 |
| Publication date | 1977-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0678 • E-ISSN: 1080-6490 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2712356 |
| OpenAlex | W2322572121 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
and ideas of participants to social structure. They should explore what Rudolph Heberle calls situational In cases of popular protest, social scientists try to discern why some men or women became active and how they may be distinguished from those who remained undemonstrative or hostile to protest. These are necessary goals of historical inquiry, yet historians must first place a movement in its historical context. The search for structural causes is important, but explanatory models must not ignore the influence of immediate causes. The Antimasonic protest of 1826-1827 is a fine example of a social movement's origins being neglected'-in turn distorting Antimasonry's later phases as social movement and third party. The protest, the things protested, and the specific events nourishing the protest must be examined if any explanations of movement or party are to make sense
Archaeology · Art · Masonry · Anarchism and Radical Politics · History · Political Economy and Marxism · Race, History, and American Society
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2006 - 2024 (19) |
| Highly cited | No |