Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Labour in the Technocratic Frame

Macroeconomic Policy and Wages in 1950s Australia

Bibliographic Data

ID2745261
AuthorsMichael Beggs (0000-0001-9023-799X, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume121
Issue1
Pages129-154
Publication date2021-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLabour History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0023-6942 • E-ISSN: 1839-3039
PublisherLiverpool University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3828/jlh.2021.21
OpenAlexW3216519186
LanguageEN

Though the labour market has always been central to macroeconomics, policy has usually had no instrument for intervening directly in the wage-setting process. But in the mid-twentieth century, economists commonly believed that there should be such an instrument. In 1950s Australia, it seemed that the arbitration system could potentially be used as such. This article uses Trevor Swan’s contemporary model of Australian policy in the 1950s to understand the tensions facing policy and explain why wage control seemed to be a solution. The arbitration judges began to consider macroeconomics in their decisions, and the unions adapted by presenting macroeconomic arguments of their own. In full employment conditions, labour had considerable economic power outside the tribunal, and the limitations of arbitration as an instrument of policy raised the shadow of unemployment as an alternative disciplining device

Arbitration · Economics · Labour economics · Macroeconomics · Political science · Politics · Shadow (psychology) · Technocracy · Tribunal · Unemployment · Wage · Australian History and Society · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae