The "Necessity" of a Socially Homogeneous Population
The Ruling Class Embraces Racial Exclusion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2750045 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Phil Griffiths (corresponding author), Phil Griffiths Phil Griffiths |
| Year | 2015 |
| Issue | 108 |
| Pages | 123 |
| Publication date | 2015-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Labour History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0023-6942 • E-ISSN: 1839-3039 |
| Publisher | Liverpool University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.5263/labourhistory.108.0123 |
| OpenAlex | W2339530854 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 3 |
In 1888, the colonial governments of Australia came together to agree on a policy of racial exclusion — aimed at preventing Chinese immigration. This article argues that key figures in the colonial ruling class feared the development of a racially divided population and shows them drawing on the mainstream liberal theory of anti-slavery, and John Stuart Mill’s theory that representative government required social homogeneity, to construct and legitimise their position. While anti-slavery has long passed as a major element in public policy, Mill’s argument for homogeneity shaped Australian justifications for White Australia through much of the twentieth century and, arguably, still informs elements of contemporary immigration policy
Class (philosophy) · Criminology · Epistemology · Homogeneous · Political science · Population · Sociology · Demography · Gender Studies · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |