"Bureaucrats as "Social Engineers

Historians interested in 20th century American reform often seek to analyze the ideologies of political leaders separately from the institutions that these same leaders created. Such emphases on ideas, as opposed to actions, has, for example, led "revisionist" American historians to argue that the presidencies of Herbert Hoover and Franklin D. Roosevelt were "conceptually continuous." Our examination of the major social welfare programs undertaken by the federal government in the 1920s disputes this claim. Examination of the operations of the federal bureaucracy instead of the rhetoric of politicians demonstrates the existence of decided policy differences between the Hoover and Roosevelt eras. "Efficiency" analogues dominant during the Hoover era were replaced with "direct service-provider" approaches which created a clear distinction between private and public welfare programs. Elements of "continuity" between the two eras have been overdrawn. Background is provided for increased understanding of some of the policy implications of America's contemporary welfare debate-particularly about "rehabilitation" strategies and/or rationales for action in the social welfare field

Bureaucracy · Government (linguistics) · Ideology · New Deal · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Social policy · Social Welfare · Sociology · Welfare · Welfare reform · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Public Administration · Race, History, and American Society · Social Work

• Reorganizing the Organizational Synthesis

  Open Access•Brian Balogh•Studies in American Political…•1991

  Add to list