Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Part II Criticisms and Reconstructions Searle's Foole

How a Constructionist Account of Society Cannot Substitute for a Causal One

Bibliographic Data

ID2800746
AuthorsMariam Thalos (0000-0002-4015-8609, corresponding author)
Year2003
Volume62
Issue1
Pages105-122
Publication date2003-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Economics and Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-9246 • E-ISSN: 1536-7150
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1536-7150.t01-1-00004
OpenAlexW2150481298
LanguageEN

In The Construction of Social Reality, John Searle promises a causal account of how social facts are constructed by human acts of intention, but specifically disavows a special theoretical space in that account for human motivation. This paper argues that such a story as Searle tells cannot serve as a causal account of society. A causal account must illuminate motivations, because doing so illuminates the aims and interests lacking which we cannot explain why these social practices come to be and not potential others. Thus Searle's would-be account of society has a problem analogous to that of Hobbes, which Hobbes's own Foole poses, and that Hobbes never answers to anyone's satisfaction

Epistemology · Social reality · Sociology · Space (punctuation) · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae