Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A treatise of the Sharīf al-Murtadā on the legality of working for the government (Mas'ala fī 'l-'amal ma'a 'l-sulṭān)

Bibliographic Data

ID2808033
AuthorsWilferd Madelung (corresponding author)
Year1980
Volume43
Issue1
Pages18-31
Publication date1980-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0041-977X • E-ISSN: 1474-0699
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0041977x0011050x
OpenAlexW2169718213
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited1

The problem of the lawfulness of accepting and holding office under an illegitimate ruler posed itself in the Imāmī Shī'a from an early date. Imāmī Shī'ism considered the historical caliphate, with the exception of the reign of 'Alī b. Abī Ṭālib, as invariably usurpatory and illegitimate. The rule of the Muslim community in succession to the Prophet was the exclusive right of 'Alī and the Imams from among his descendants. They had been pushed aside from their rightful position, first by the three caliphs preceding 'Alī and later, by the Umayyads and the 'Abbāsids. On the other hand, the Imams from the fourth, 'Alī Zayn al-'Ābidīn, had ceased actively to seek to rule through the overthrow of the usurpatory caliphate. The sixth Imam, Ja'far al-Ṣādiq, rejected in particular any offer of help to restore him to his rightful position by force and strictly forbade his followers to engage in revolutionary activity on behalf of the Imams until the rise of the Qā'im Imam who would claim his right to rule with the sword. This quietist policy was consistently followed by his successors and came to be reflected in Imāmī belief and doctrine which did not anticipate a return of the Imams to rule before the coming of the eschatological Mahdī

Ancient history · Aside · Caliphate · Doctrine · Government (linguistics) · Physics · Political science · Politics · Principle of legality · Reign · Rule of law · Ruler · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Education and Islamic Studies · History · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Philosophy

  • Al-Karkh

    Nassima Neggaz•Studia Islamica•2020

  • Rebellion and Violence in Islamic Law

    Open Access•Khaled Abou El Fadl•Rebellion and Violence in Islamic…•2001

  • Doubt in Islamic Law

    Open Access•Intisar A Rabb•Doubt in Islamic Law•1920

  • Friends of the Emir

    Open Access•Luke Yarbrough, Luke B Yarbrough•Friends of the Emir•2019

  • Jāḥiẓian Negotiations

    Hussein Ali Abdulsater•Global Intellectual History•2023

  • Divine Sovereignty and Clerical Authority in Early Shi‘i Islamism

    Open Access•Oliver Scharbrodt•Journal of the Royal Asiatic…•2021

  • La eficacia legal de actos de taqiyya en la jurisprudencia imami

    Open Access•Robert Gleave•Al-Qanṭara•2013

  • The Crisis of the Imamate and the Institution of Occultation in Twelver Shiʿism

    Open Access•Saïd Amir Arjomand•International Journal Middle East…•1996

  • Education and Islamic Trends in Northern Nigeria

    Muhammad Sani Umar•Africa Today•2001

  • Disrobing judges with veiled truths

    David Hollenberg•Religion•2003

  • Religious Devotion to Political Secularism

    Open Access•Naser Ghobadzadeh•Religions•2022

  • Spiritual Aroma

    Open Access•Raymond Firth•American Anthropologist•1981

  • The judge as tragic hero

    Open Access•Morgan Clarke•American Ethnologist•2012

  • Religion and State in Iran 1785–1906

    Hamid Algar•Religion and State in Iran…•1969

Unique citing works13
Citations per year0,12
Citation span1920 - 2023 (104)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae