In Defense of the Exclusionary Rule
What It Protects Are the Constitutional Rights of Citizens, Threatened by the Court, the Executive and the Congress
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2820849 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Morris D Forkosch (Yeshiva University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1982 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 151-151 |
| Publication date | 1982-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Economics and Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9246 • E-ISSN: 1536-7150 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1982.tb03165.x |
| OpenAlex | W1979623443 |
| Language | EN |
The attack upon the judicial rule that evidence seized in contravention of a person's constitutional rights shall be excluded from his trial, regardless how damaging to the prosecution's case-an attack advocated by Chief Justice Burger and President Reagan-rests upon a misunderstanding. This rule, the exclusionary rule, has not resulted in acquittals that would not otherwise have occurred. And it does, and has, protected the innocent as well as the guilty. The rule was fashioned by the Supreme Court of the United States to safeguard constitutional rights. These rights cannot be abridged constitutionally by the executive or the legislature; they can, but should not, be modified by their creators, the Justices, for they exist to check unconstitutional and illegal acts by agents of the State
Constitution · Constitutional law · Constitutional review · Economic Justice · Exclusionary Rule · Legislature · Political science · Politics · Rule of law · State (computer science) · Supreme court · Criminal Law and Evidence · Law · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Legal and Constitutional Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|