Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Decollectivization of the Chinese Countryside

A Survey of Twenty-eight Villages

Bibliographic Data

ID2848729
AuthorsJonathan Unger (Chinese Medical Center, corresponding author)
Year1985
Volume58
Issue4
Pages585
Publication date1985-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePacific Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0030-851X • E-ISSN: 1715-3379
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2758470
OpenAlexW2335429073
LanguageEN
Citations received25

CHINA'S RECENT MOVE away from collective agriculture has affected very dramatically the lives of three-quarters of a billion people. It may well constitute the single most important policy shift in China since the introduction of collectives in the mid-1950s. The restoration of family farming has been so recent, however, that a whole range of simple questions remain as yet unanswered. Did the peasantry play any role in deciding whether their village should decollectivize? Did they help decide what new type of agricultural system should be implemented locally? Were any sizeable numbers of peasants opposed to the breakup of collective production and, if so, on what grounds? What were the immediate effects on the different types of peasant households? To what degree have different types of villages been differently affected by the changeover to family smallholdings? In an attempt to answer such questions, a series of interviews was conducted in mid-1983 with twenty-eight emigrants from the Chinese countryside who were working in Hong Kong and who regularly returned to their home villages to visit their parents, spouses and children. Eighteen of them were from villages in Guangdong province; the remaining ten came from villages distributed in eight other provinces and regions.' All the twenty-eight had returned home on at least one extended visit, ranging from a week to several months in duration, during the year prior to the interviews. Such interviewing from afar cannot guarantee a scientifically random sample of villages, nor can interviewees always be counted on to provide precise and accurate information about every aspect of their native communities. But if conducted with all due caution, such interviews can provide a considerable amount of information unobtainable through other means.2 Though recent on-the-spot studies of decollectivization at

Changeover · China · Economic growth · Economics · Emigration · Geography · Interview · Peasant · Political science · Rural area · Socioeconomics · Sociology · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance

  • Chinese Economics, 1976-1986

    Open Access•Erhard Louven•The Copenhagen Journal of Asian…•1987

  • Chinese Rural Policy Between Social Change and State Planning

    Flemming Christiansen, Flemming Juul Christiansen•Forum for Development Studies•1998

  • Popular Response to China's Fertility Transition

    M K Whyte, Shimin Gu et al.•Population and Development Review•1987

  • The Great Curse

    Albert Berry•Great Curse•2024

  • The Politics of Lodging Complaints in Rural China

    Open Access•Kevin J O’brien, Kevin J O'Brien et al.•The China Quarterly•1995

  • State and Peasant in Post-Revolution China

    Jonathan Unger•The Journal of Peasant Studies•1989

  • From Peasants to Farmers

    Open Access•Q F Zhang, John A Donaldson•Latin American Politics and Society•2010

  • Egalitarian Redistributions of Agricultural Land in China through Community Consensus

    Sherry Tao Kong•The China Journal•2013

  • A Comparative Study of Agricultural Reform and Labor Reform in China

    Open Access•Junghee Lee, Jung‐Hee Lee•Pacific Focus•1997

  • The devil is in the local

    James Tong•Religion State & Society•2014

  • The Household Responsibility System, Karl Marx's Theory of Property and Antony M. Honor's Concept of Ownership

    Open Access•Gaofeng Meng•Science & Society•2019

  • Urbanisation, central planning and Tolley's model of urban growth

    Open Access•Per Ronnas, Orjan Sjoberg•Geoforum•1993

  • Political Aspects of Rural Economic Reform in China

    Open Access•Gordon White•IDS Bulletin•1987

  • The shaping of an institutional choice

    Open Access•Ying Bai, James Kai‐sing Kung et al.•Explorations in Economic History•2014

  • Maoism and the Liberation of the Poor

    Open Access•E Friedman•World Politics•1987

  • The Impact of Economic Reforms in the Chinese Countryside

    Open Access•Gordon White•Modern China•1987

  • Peasant Households Between Plan and Market

    Open Access•Jean C Oi•Modern China•1986

  • Group Farming and Work Incentives in Collective-Era China

    Open Access•Louis Putterman•Modern China•1988

  • International Links and the Socioeconomic Development of Rural China

    Open Access•Yuen-Fong Woon, Yuen‐fong Woon•Modern China•1990

  • Markets and Income Inequality in Rural China

    Andrew G Walder•American Sociological Review•2002

  • The Achievements, Contradictions and Demise of the Rural Collectives in Songzi County, China

    Open Access•Zhun Xu•Development and Change•2015

  • Choice of Land Tenure in China

    James Kai‐sing Kung•Economic Development and Cultural…•2002

  • Institutional Change and Economic Growth in China

    Open Access•Nee, Victor Nee et al.•The Journal of Asian Studies•1990

  • Controlling births and bodies in village China

    Open Access•Greenhalgh, Susan Greenhalgh•American Ethnologist•1994

  • Market Transition and Societal Transformation in Reforming State Socialism

    Nee, Victor Nee et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•1996

Unique citing works25
Citations per year0,63
Citation span1986 - 2024 (39)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 22
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae