Language and Non-Linguistic Patterns
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2865066 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M B Emeneau (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1950 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 199 |
| Publication date | 1950-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0097-8507 • E-ISSN: 1535-0665 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/410057 |
| OpenAlex | W2324319135 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
An essential part of Bloomfield's definition of linguistic forms and constructions is the attachment to them of stimulus-reaction features, which are his definition of meaning. The linguistic scholar is still bedeviled by the many problems involved in talking about meaning, and he still lacks a body of dogma to which he can refer when meaning is talked about. This paper is an attempt to explore one of the problems and to establish a postulate which may be added to Bloomfield's Set of Postulates
Epistemology · Linguistics · Meaning (existential) · Reflexive pronoun · Relation (database) · Set (abstract data type) · Verb · Computer Science · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Lexicography and Language Studies · Multilingual Education and Policy · Philosophy · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,05 |
| Citation span | 1952 - 2006 (55) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |